Gattrell William T, Hungin Amrit Pali, Price Amy, Winchester Christopher C, Tovey David, Hughes Ellen L, van Zuuren Esther J, Goldman Keith, Logullo Patricia, Matheis Robert, Harrison Niall
Global Medical Affairs, Ipsen, Abingdon, UK.
Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2022 Jun 7;7(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s41073-022-00122-0.
Structured, systematic methods to formulate consensus recommendations, such as the Delphi process or nominal group technique, among others, provide the opportunity to harness the knowledge of experts to support clinical decision making in areas of uncertainty. They are widely used in biomedical research, in particular where disease characteristics or resource limitations mean that high-quality evidence generation is difficult. However, poor reporting of methods used to reach a consensus - for example, not clearly explaining the definition of consensus, or not stating how consensus group panellists were selected - can potentially undermine confidence in this type of research and hinder reproducibility. Our objective is therefore to systematically develop a reporting guideline to help the biomedical research and clinical practice community describe the methods or techniques used to reach consensus in a complete, transparent, and consistent manner.
The ACCORD (ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document) project will take place in five stages and follow the EQUATOR Network guidance for the development of reporting guidelines. In Stage 1, a multidisciplinary Steering Committee has been established to lead and coordinate the guideline development process. In Stage 2, a systematic literature review will identify evidence on the quality of the reporting of consensus methodology, to obtain potential items for a reporting checklist. In Stage 3, Delphi methodology will be used to reach consensus regarding the checklist items, first among the Steering Committee, and then among a broader Delphi panel comprising participants with a range of expertise, including patient representatives. In Stage 4, the reporting guideline will be finalised in a consensus meeting, along with the production of an Explanation and Elaboration (E&E) document. In Stage 5, we plan to publish the reporting guideline and E&E document in open-access journals, supported by presentations at appropriate events. Dissemination of the reporting guideline, including a website linked to social media channels, is crucial for the document to be implemented in practice.
The ACCORD reporting guideline will provide a set of minimum items that should be reported about methods used to achieve consensus, including approaches ranging from simple unstructured opinion gatherings to highly structured processes.
结构化、系统化的方法,如德尔菲法或名义群体技术等,用于形成共识性建议,为利用专家知识以支持不确定性领域的临床决策提供了契机。它们在生物医学研究中被广泛应用,尤其是在疾病特征或资源限制使得高质量证据生成困难的情况下。然而,用于达成共识的方法报告不佳——例如,未清晰解释共识的定义,或未说明共识小组专家小组成员是如何选取的——可能会削弱对这类研究的信心并阻碍其可重复性。因此,我们的目标是系统地制定一份报告指南,以帮助生物医学研究和临床实践领域完整、透明且一致地描述用于达成共识的方法或技术。
ACCORD(准确共识报告文件)项目将分五个阶段进行,并遵循EQUATOR网络关于制定报告指南的指导方针。在第一阶段,已成立一个多学科指导委员会来领导和协调指南制定过程。在第二阶段,将进行系统的文献综述,以确定关于共识方法报告质量的证据,从而获取报告清单的潜在条目。在第三阶段,将使用德尔菲法就清单条目达成共识,首先在指导委员会内部,然后在一个更广泛的德尔菲小组中达成共识,该小组包括具有一系列专业知识的参与者,其中包括患者代表。在第四阶段,将在一次共识会议上最终确定报告指南,并制作一份解释与详述(E&E)文件。在第五阶段,我们计划在开放获取期刊上发表报告指南和E&E文件,并在适当活动中进行展示。传播报告指南,包括一个与社交媒体渠道链接的网站,对于该文件在实践中的实施至关重要。
ACCORD报告指南将提供一套关于用于达成共识的方法应报告的最低条目,包括从简单的非结构化意见收集到高度结构化流程等各种方法。