Department of Medicine, New York City Health + Hospitals/Jacobi, Bronx, NY, USA.
Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Int J Stroke. 2023 Apr;18(4):392-399. doi: 10.1177/17474930221109149. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
Heart failure (HF) is a major public health issue associated with significantly increased risk of stroke. It remains uncertain whether oral anticoagulation (OAC) in patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm (HF-SR) could improve prognosis.
We performed a systematic search of PubMed and Embase databases for randomized controlled clinical trials assessing oral anticoagulants versus antiplatelets or placebo in patients with HF or ventricular dysfunction/cardiomyopathy without clinical HF and SR. The outcomes assessed were stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, myocardial infarction, all-cause mortality, and HF hospitalization.
Seven trials of 15,794 patients were eligible for our analyses. The overall follow-up duration was 32,367 patient-years corresponding to a mean follow-up of 2.05 years per patient. Four trials included patients treated with warfarin and three included patients treated with rivaroxaban. OAC was associated with reduced rate of stroke or systemic embolism compared to control (odds ratio (OR): 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44, 0.73, number needed to treat (NNT): 71.9) but higher rate of major bleeding (OR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.47, 2.50, number needed to harm (NNH): 57.1). In the subgroup analysis according to the type of OAC, rivaroxaban was associated with significantly reduced rate of stroke or systemic embolism (1.24 vs 1.97 events per 100 patient-years, respectively, OR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.45, 0.88, NNT: 82) and higher risk of major bleeding (OR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.26, 2.20) compared to antiplatelets or placebo. There was no significant differences between groups for the outcomes of myocardial infarction, all-cause mortality, and HF hospitalization.
This analysis shows that any benefit of OAC for stroke prevention may be offset by an increased risk of major bleeding in HF-SR patients. A well-designed randomized controlled trial of newer safer OACs is needed in this population.
心力衰竭(HF)是与中风风险显著增加相关的主要公共卫生问题。目前仍不确定 HF 伴窦性节律(HF-SR)患者口服抗凝治疗(OAC)是否可以改善预后。
我们系统地检索了 PubMed 和 Embase 数据库,以评估 HF 或心室功能障碍/心肌病但无临床 HF 和 SR 的患者中口服抗凝剂与抗血小板药物或安慰剂相比的随机对照临床试验。评估的结局包括中风/全身性栓塞、大出血、心肌梗死、全因死亡率和 HF 住院率。
共有 7 项纳入 15794 例患者的试验符合我们的分析标准。总的随访时间为 32367 患者年,平均每位患者的随访时间为 2.05 年。四项试验纳入了华法林治疗的患者,三项试验纳入了利伐沙班治疗的患者。与对照组相比,OAC 可降低中风或全身性栓塞的发生率(比值比(OR):0.57,95%置信区间(CI):0.44,0.73,需要治疗的人数(NNT):71.9),但大出血的发生率更高(OR:1.92,95%CI:1.47,2.50,需要伤害的人数(NNH):57.1)。根据 OAC 类型的亚组分析,利伐沙班与中风或全身性栓塞发生率显著降低相关(分别为每 100 患者年 1.24 和 1.97 例事件,OR:0.63,95%CI:0.45,0.88,NNT:82),大出血风险更高(OR:1.66,95%CI:1.26,2.20)。各组之间心肌梗死、全因死亡率和 HF 住院率无显著差异。
本分析表明,OAC 预防中风的任何益处都可能因 HF-SR 患者大出血风险增加而被抵消。需要在该人群中进行一项设计良好的新型安全 OAC 的随机对照试验。