Department of Exercise Rehabilitation and Welfare, Gachon University, Incheon, South Korea.
Front Public Health. 2022 May 25;10:871468. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.871468. eCollection 2022.
This study was conducted to develop evaluation indicators for instructor-led management of sports centers for the disabled using universal design (UD) principles in South Korea. These indicators have been developed through Delphi technique to identify the effectiveness of an instructor's management skills. There were 11 documents related to UD used in the literature review, and seven were related to the evaluation index. Through reading and analyzing the relevant contents of the collected literature and many rounds of the Delphi technique, we selected the method and criteria for deriving the evaluation index. In this study, we developed a method that constitutes an evaluation index. The index comprises one evaluation criterion and four evaluation indices. First, for the sub-items of the "recruitment" category, four principles of UD and one supplementary principle of product performance program (PPP) were applied to create items for the evaluation index. Second, the sub-items of the "education" category comprise three evaluation criteria and 10 evaluation indicators. These were applied to the fourth principle of UD and the first and second by-supplementary principles of PPP. The third category, "welfare," comprised two evaluation criteria and six evaluation indices, and the first by-supplementary principle of PPP was applied to the evaluation indices. The index created for evaluating instructors in sports centers using the method elucidated in this study was adequately reliable. Following a similar method, more evaluation indicators should be developed for evaluations of other functions (such as programs, public relations, safety, and finance) based on the principles of UD.
本研究旨在为韩国体育中心的残疾人士使用通用设计(UD)原则的指导员管理制定评估指标。这些指标是通过 Delphi 技术开发的,以确定指导员管理技能的有效性。在文献综述中,有 11 份与 UD 相关的文件,其中 7 份与评估指标相关。通过阅读和分析收集文献的相关内容以及多轮 Delphi 技术,我们选择了推导评估指标的方法和标准。在本研究中,我们开发了一种构成评估指标的方法。该指标包括一个评估标准和四个评估指标。首先,对于“招聘”类别的子项,我们应用了 UD 的四项原则和产品性能计划(PPP)的一项补充原则,为评估指标创建项目。其次,“教育”类别的子项包括三个评估标准和十个评估指标。这些指标应用于 UD 的第四项原则和 PPP 的第一和第二项补充原则。第三个类别“福利”包括两个评估标准和六个评估指标,评估指标应用了 PPP 的第一项补充原则。本研究阐明的方法为体育中心指导员评估创建的指标具有足够的可靠性。根据 UD 的原则,应该采用类似的方法,为其他功能(如项目、公共关系、安全和财务)的评估开发更多的评估指标。