Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2023 Dec;29(6):748-758. doi: 10.1177/15910199221106049. Epub 2022 Jun 12.
Basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is an infrequent but often fatal subtype of stroke. Predicting outcomes and selecting patients for endovascular therapy (EVT) remains challenging. Advances in neuroimaging and the development of prognostic scoring systems have augmented clinical decision-making over time. Recent randomized trials, BEST (Basilar Artery Occlusion Endovascular Intervention vs. Standard Medical Treatment), BASICS (Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study), BAOCHE (Basilar Artery Occlusion CHinese Endovascular Trial) and ATTENTION (Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion), compared EVT and medical management for patients with BAO. These trials yielded mixed results. The former two suggested unclear benefit while the latter two supported a benefit of EVT. While all had limitations, most providers agree caution should be exercised when excluding patients from EVT who may stand to benefit. Further studies are therefore needed to determine the effectiveness, safety, selection criteria, and optimal technical approach for EVT among patients with BAO. Hyperacute-phase advanced imaging can offer several benefits to aid decision making. It is reasonable to exclude patients with low National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), large imaging-proven cores, and evidence of perforator occlusion by branch atheromatous disease. Herein, we review the clinical presentation, imaging work-up, treatments, and clinical outcomes for BAO, while highlighting knowledge gaps in treatment selection and technique.
基底动脉闭塞(BAO)是一种不常见但通常致命的中风亚型。预测结果和为血管内治疗(EVT)选择患者仍然具有挑战性。神经影像学的进步和预后评分系统的发展随着时间的推移增强了临床决策。最近的随机试验,BEST(基底动脉闭塞血管内干预与标准药物治疗)、BASICS(基底动脉国际合作研究)、BAOCHE(基底动脉闭塞中国血管内试验)和 ATTENTION(急性基底动脉闭塞的血管内治疗),比较了 EVT 和药物治疗基底动脉闭塞患者的效果。这些试验的结果喜忧参半。前两项研究表明 EVT 可能没有明显获益,而后两项研究则支持 EVT 的获益。尽管这些试验都存在局限性,但大多数医生认为,对于可能受益于 EVT 的患者,在排除 EVT 时应谨慎。因此,需要进一步的研究来确定 BAO 患者 EVT 的有效性、安全性、选择标准和最佳技术方法。超急性期高级成像可以提供一些辅助决策的好处。对于 NIHSS 评分低、影像学证实的核心梗死较大且分支粥样硬化病变导致穿支闭塞的患者,可以合理排除 EVT。在此,我们回顾了 BAO 的临床表现、影像学检查、治疗和临床结果,同时强调了治疗选择和技术方面的知识空白。