Suppr超能文献

根据神经精神问卷的神经精神症状的双周波动:无规律的症状或评分?

Biweekly fluctuations of neuropsychiatric symptoms according to the Neuropsychiatric Inventory: Erratic symptoms or scores?

机构信息

Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center Erasmus MC, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Jul;37(7). doi: 10.1002/gps.5770.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study investigates the stability of neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) assessed biweekly using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) in a memory clinic population during a 6 week period.

METHODS

Twenty-three spousal caregivers (mean [SD] age = 69.7 [8.8], 82.6% female) of 23 patients (43.5% had dementia) completed all assessments. The NPI was assessed four times during 6 weeks. We examined whether NPI domains were present during all four assessments, studied within-person variation for each NPI domain, and calculated Spearman's correlations between subsequent time-points. Furthermore, we associated repeated NPI assessments with repeated measures of caregiver burden to examine the clinical impact of changes in NPI scores over time.

RESULTS

The course of NPS was highly irregular according to the NPI, with only 35.8% of the NPI domains that were present at baseline persisted during all 6 weeks. We observed large within-person variation in the presence of individual NPI domains (61.3%, range 37.5%-83.9%) and inconsistent correlations between NPI assessments (e.g., range r  = 0.20-0.57 for agitation, range r  = 0.29-0.59 for anxiety). Higher NPI total scores were related to higher caregiver burden (r  = 0.60, p < 0.001), but changes in NPI total scores were unrelated to changes in caregiver burden (r  = 0.16, p = 0.20).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed strong fluctuations in NPI scores within very short time windows raising the question whether this represents erratic symptoms and/or scores. Further studies are needed to investigate the origins of these fluctuations.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查在 6 周内,使用神经精神病学问卷(NPI)每两周评估一次的记忆诊所患者的神经精神症状(NPS)的稳定性。

方法

23 名配偶护理者(平均[标准差]年龄=69.7[8.8],82.6%为女性)完成了 23 名患者(43.5%患有痴呆症)的所有评估。NPI 在 6 周内评估了 4 次。我们检查了 NPI 各领域是否在所有 4 次评估中都存在,研究了每个 NPI 领域的个体内变异,并计算了随后时间点之间的 Spearman 相关系数。此外,我们将重复的 NPI 评估与护理者负担的重复测量相关联,以检查 NPI 评分随时间变化的临床影响。

结果

根据 NPI,NPS 的发生情况极不规则,只有 35.8%的 NPI 领域在整个 6 周内持续存在。我们观察到个体 NPI 领域的存在存在很大的个体内变异(61.3%,范围 37.5%-83.9%),并且 NPI 评估之间的相关性不一致(例如,激动的范围 r=0.20-0.57,焦虑的范围 r=0.29-0.59)。较高的 NPI 总分与较高的护理者负担相关(r=0.60,p<0.001),但 NPI 总分的变化与护理者负担的变化无关(r=0.16,p=0.20)。

结论

我们在非常短的时间窗口内观察到 NPI 评分的强烈波动,这引发了一个问题,即这是否代表了不稳定的症状和/或评分。需要进一步的研究来调查这些波动的来源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc3b/9327507/5a38802e843c/GPS-37-0-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验