From the Department of Hand and Foot Surgery, Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou.
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical College, Hannan, People's Republic of China.
Ann Plast Surg. 2022 Aug 1;89(2):191-195. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003262. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
In finger reconstruction, big-toe wraparound flap (WAF) transfer provides excellent results. However, difficulty in healing and impaired function at the donor site are common. We aimed to explore an ideal method to address these complications.
This retrospective study involved 22 patients who were treated with big toe WAF transfer for finger reconstruction between 2016 and 2020. Patients were categorized into cohorts by donor site repair method: second-toe medial-side adjacent toe flap and skin graft (cohort 1) and skin graft alone (cohort 2). Functional outcomes, aesthetic appearance, and complications at the donor site were compared. Functional outcomes were assessed according to the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) for hallux metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal score, Foot Function Index-Verbal Rating Scales (FFI-5 pt), and visual analog scale for pain. Aesthetic appearance was evaluated according to the adjusted question 28 in the Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire.
The mean pain scores in AOFAS and FFI-5 pt were 38.00 ± 4.22 and 3.75 ± 2.37, and 32.50 ± 4.52 and 6.60 ± 2.14 in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively, which showed no significant differences. The method in cohort 1 can reduce the level of pain. This was further confirmed by visual analog scale scores of 3.40 ± 0.84 and 6.42 ± 7.93 in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. The mean functional scores in AOFAS and FFI-5 pt were 38.40 ± 2.37 and 1.25 ± 1.62, and 37.92 ± 2.15 and 1.56 ± 2.11 in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively, which showed no significant differences. Eight patients developed complications: 1 patient (1/10 [10%]) in cohort 1 developed a superficial infection, and in cohort 2, 7 patients (7/12, 58.30%) developed complications, including 2 short-term complications with partial necrosis and 1 delayed healing. Long-term complications included the following: scar discomfort (2 cases), pain discomfort (1 case), and skin ulceration due to repeated wear and tear (1 case). Cohort 2 had significantly more complications than cohort 1.
Second-toe medial-side adjacent toe flap combined with skin graft had better aesthetic appearance, less complications, and less pain compared with skin graft alone. Hence, it can be a reliable technique for repairing the donor site after big-toe WAF transfer.
在手指重建中,大脚趾环绕皮瓣(WAF)转移提供了极好的效果。然而,供区愈合困难和功能受损是常见的。我们旨在探索一种解决这些并发症的理想方法。
本回顾性研究纳入了 2016 年至 2020 年间接受大脚趾 WAF 转移进行手指重建的 22 例患者。根据供区修复方法将患者分为两组:第二趾内侧相邻趾瓣和皮片移植(队列 1)和单纯皮片移植(队列 2)。比较供区的功能结果、美学外观和并发症。根据美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)的大脚趾跖趾关节-指间关节评分、足功能指数-口述评分量表(FFI-5 pt)和疼痛视觉模拟评分评估功能结果。根据密歇根手结果问卷的调整问题 28 评估美学外观。
队列 1 的 AOFAS 和 FFI-5 pt 的平均疼痛评分分别为 38.00±4.22 和 3.75±2.37,队列 2 分别为 32.50±4.52 和 6.60±2.14,无显著差异。队列 1 的方法可以减轻疼痛程度。这进一步通过队列 1 和 2 的视觉模拟评分分别为 3.40±0.84 和 6.42±7.93 得到证实。队列 1 和 2 的 AOFAS 和 FFI-5 pt 的平均功能评分分别为 38.40±2.37 和 1.25±1.62,37.92±2.15 和 1.56±2.11,无显著差异。8 例患者发生并发症:队列 1 中 1 例(1/10 [10%])发生浅表感染,队列 2 中 7 例(7/12,58.30%)发生并发症,包括 2 例短期并发症伴部分坏死和 1 例延迟愈合。长期并发症包括以下情况:瘢痕不适(2 例)、疼痛不适(1 例)和因反复磨损导致皮肤溃疡(1 例)。队列 2 的并发症明显多于队列 1。
与单纯皮片移植相比,第二趾内侧相邻趾瓣联合皮片移植具有更好的美学外观、更少的并发症和更少的疼痛,因此可以作为大脚趾 WAF 转移后供区修复的可靠技术。