University of South Florida, Tampa, FL,USA.
Health Educ Behav. 2023 Jun;50(3):359-368. doi: 10.1177/10901981221101355. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
. Volunteering promotes well-being and may provide added purpose to life after retirement. Limited evidence exists regarding the characteristics and study adherence among those who participate in longitudinal studies while also volunteering outside the study. We assessed characteristics and adherence of older adults who volunteered outside of participation in a regular monthly cognitive monitoring study. All 124 participants with complete data were included. Participants were from a regular cognitive monitoring study that required completion of a 15-min monthly online cognitive assessment. Analysis of covariance and logistic regression analysis were performed to examine differences between volunteers and nonvolunteers. Those who volunteered outside the study were significantly less likely to be college-educated (although all participants were highly educated) but the two groups were cognitively similar. Volunteers had significantly lower scores for neuroticism. Those who volunteered also were significantly less likely to drop out but had poorer study adherence. The most frequent type of volunteering was religious activities. Volunteers were motivated mainly by altruism, although most reported multiple reasons. Older adults who enroll in a longitudinal research study and volunteer outside the study have similar personal characteristics as those who opt out of additional volunteering, with somewhat less education and more favorable personality traits. However, they may be more likely to drop out and need more reminders. Therefore, those who volunteer outside a study may need more attention from study administrators and potentially a more individualized schedule that works around their volunteer obligations.
志愿服务可以促进幸福感,并为退休后的生活提供更多目标。关于那些在参与纵向研究的同时也在研究之外参与志愿服务的人的特征和研究依从性,目前仅有有限的证据。我们评估了在常规每月认知监测研究之外参与志愿服务的老年人的特征和依从性。所有完成完整数据的 124 名参与者均包括在内。参与者来自一项常规认知监测研究,该研究要求每月完成 15 分钟的在线认知评估。我们进行了协方差分析和逻辑回归分析,以检查志愿者和非志愿者之间的差异。
那些在研究之外进行志愿服务的人接受大学教育的可能性明显较低(尽管所有参与者都受过高等教育),但两组人的认知水平相似。志愿者的神经质得分明显较低。那些参与志愿服务的人也不太可能中途退出,但研究依从性较差。最常见的志愿服务类型是宗教活动。志愿者主要是出于利他主义而参与,但大多数人报告了多个原因。
参加纵向研究并在研究之外进行志愿服务的老年人与选择不进行额外志愿服务的老年人具有相似的个人特征,他们受教育程度较低,性格特征更为有利。然而,他们可能更有可能中途退出,需要更多的提醒。因此,那些在研究之外进行志愿服务的人可能需要研究管理人员更多的关注,并可能需要一个更个性化的时间表,以适应他们的志愿服务义务。