Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Virchows Arch. 2022 Sep;481(3):387-396. doi: 10.1007/s00428-022-03331-6. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
The aim of this study is to investigate the incidental prostate cancer (iPCa) detection rates of different embedding methods in a large, contemporary cohort of patients with bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) treated with transurethral surgery. We relied on an institutional tertiary-care database to identify BOO patients who underwent either transurethral loop resection or laser (Holmium:yttrium-aluminium garnet) enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) between 01/2012 and 12/2019. Embedding methods differed with regard to the extent of the additional prostate tissue submitted following the first ten cassettes of primary embedding (cohort A: one [additional] cassette/10 g residual tissue vs. cohort B: complete embedding of the residual tissue). Detection rates of iPCa among the different embedding methods were compared. Subsequently, subgroup analyses by embedding protocol were repeated in HoLEP-treated patients only. In the overall cohort, the iPCa detection rate was 11% (46/420). In cohort A (n = 299), tissue embedding resulted in a median of 8 cassettes/patient (range 1-38) vs. a median of 15 (range 2-74) in cohort B (n = 121) (p < .001). The iPCa detection rate was 8% (23/299) and 19% (23/121) in cohort A vs. cohort B, respectively (p < .001). Virtual reduction of the number of tissue cassettes to ten cassettes resulted in a iPCa detection rate of 96% in both cohorts, missing one stage T1a/ISUP grade 1 carcinoma. Increasing the number of cassettes by two and eight cassettes, respectively, resulted in a detection rate of 100% in both cohorts without revealing high-grade carcinomas. Subgroup analyses in HoLEP patients confirmed these findings, demonstrated by a 100 vs. 96% iPCa detection rate following examination of the first ten cassettes, missing one case of T1a/ISUP 1. Examination of 8 additional cassettes resulted in a 100% detection rate. The extent of embedding of material obtained from transurethral prostate resection correlates with the iPCa detection rate. However, the submission of 10 cassettes appears to be a reasonable threshold to reduce resource utilization while maintaining secure cancer detection.
本研究旨在探讨在接受经尿道手术治疗的大量当代膀胱出口梗阻 (BOO) 患者中,不同包埋方法对偶然发现前列腺癌 (iPCa) 的检测率。我们依靠机构的三级护理数据库,确定了在 2012 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间接受经尿道环切除术或激光(钬:钇 - 铝石榴石)前列腺剜除术 (HoLEP) 的 BOO 患者。包埋方法因首次 10 个组织盒后提交的额外前列腺组织的范围而异(队列 A:一个 [额外] 组织盒/10g 残留组织与队列 B:残留组织的完整包埋)。比较了不同包埋方法之间的 iPCa 检出率。随后,仅在接受 HoLEP 治疗的患者中重复了按包埋方案进行的亚组分析。在整个队列中,iPCa 的检出率为 11%(46/420)。在队列 A(n=299)中,组织包埋导致每个患者中位数 8 个组织盒(范围 1-38),而队列 B(n=121)的中位数为 15 个组织盒(范围 2-74)(p<.001)。队列 A(n=299)的 iPCa 检出率为 8%(23/299),队列 B 为 19%(23/121)(p<.001)。将组织盒数量减少到 10 个,两个队列的 iPCa 检出率均为 96%,错过了一个 T1a/ISUP 1 级癌。增加两个和八个组织盒,两个队列的检出率均为 100%,没有发现高级别癌。HoLEP 患者的亚组分析证实了这些发现,即前 10 个组织盒检查后的 iPCa 检出率为 100%,错过了一个 T1a/ISUP 1 病例。检查 8 个额外的组织盒可实现 100%的检出率。经尿道前列腺切除术后获得的组织包埋程度与 iPCa 的检出率相关。然而,提交 10 个组织盒似乎是一个合理的阈值,可以减少资源利用,同时确保癌症的检出。