Suppr超能文献

频率和预测因素创伤转移无效农村一级创伤中心。

Frequency and Predictors of Trauma Transfer Futility to a Rural Level I Trauma Center.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont; Ethics Consultation Service, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont.

Department of Surgery, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2022 Nov;279:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.05.013. Epub 2022 Jun 15.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Transfer of trauma patients whose injuries are deemed unsurvivable, often results in early death or transition to comfort care and could be considered misuse of health care resources. This is particularly true where tertiary care resources are limited. Identifying riskfactors for and predicting futile transfers could reduce this impact and help to optimize triage and management.

METHODS

A retrospective study of interfacility trauma transfers to a single rural Level I rauma center from 2014 to 2019. Futility was defined as death, hospice, or declaration of comfort measures within 48 h of transfer without procedural or radiographic intervention at the accepting center. Multiple logistic regressions identified independent predictors of futile transfers. The predictive power of Mechanism,Glasgow coma scale, Age, and Arterial pressure (MGAP), an injury severity score based on Mechanism, Glasgow coma scale, Age, and systolic blood Pressure, were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 3368 trauma transfers, 37 (1.1%) met criteria as futile. Futile transfers occurred among patients who were significantly older with falls as the most common mechanism. Age, Glasgow coma scale, systolic blood Pressure and Injury Severity Score were significant (P < 0.05) independent predictors of futile transfer. MGAP had a high predictive power area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC 0.864, 95% confidence interval 0.803-0.925) for futility.

CONCLUSIONS

A small proportion (1.1%) of transfers to a rural Level I trauma center met criteria for futility. Predictive tools, such as MGAP scoring, can provide objective criteria for evaluation of transfer necessity and prompt care pathways that involve pre-transfer communications, telemedicine, and/or patient centered goals of care discussions. Such tools could be used in conjunction with a more granular assessment regarding potential operational barriers to reduce futile transfers and to enhance optimization of resource utilization in low-resource service areas.

摘要

简介

对于那些被认为无法存活的创伤患者进行转院,往往会导致其早期死亡或转为接受舒适护理,这可能被视为医疗资源的滥用。在三级医疗资源有限的情况下,这种情况尤其如此。确定并预测无效转院的风险因素,可以减少这种影响,并有助于优化分诊和管理。

方法

这是一项对 2014 年至 2019 年期间,一家农村一级创伤中心接受的 3368 例创伤患者进行的回顾性研究。无效转院定义为在接受中心没有进行程序或影像学干预的情况下,在转院后 48 小时内死亡、接受临终关怀或宣布接受舒适护理措施。多因素逻辑回归确定了无效转院的独立预测因素。评估了基于机制、格拉斯哥昏迷评分、年龄和动脉压(MGAP)的损伤严重程度评分,即基于机制、格拉斯哥昏迷评分、年龄和收缩压的损伤严重程度评分的预测能力。

结果

在 3368 例创伤转院患者中,有 37 例(1.1%)符合无效转院标准。无效转院发生在年龄较大的患者中,其中最常见的机制是跌倒。年龄、格拉斯哥昏迷评分、收缩压和损伤严重程度评分是无效转院的独立显著预测因素(P<0.05)。MGAP 对无效性的预测能力较高,ROC 曲线下面积为 0.864(95%置信区间为 0.803-0.925)。

结论

在一家农村一级创伤中心,只有一小部分(1.1%)的转院患者符合无效转院的标准。预测工具,如 MGAP 评分,可以为评估转院必要性提供客观标准,并为转院患者制定提前沟通、远程医疗和/或以患者为中心的治疗目标的护理路径。在资源有限的服务地区,可以将这些工具与更细致的潜在操作障碍评估相结合,以减少无效转院,并优化资源利用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验