Congedi Sabrina, Savio Federica, Auciello Maria, Salvadori Sabrina, Nardo Daniel, Bonadies Luca
Department of Woman's and Child's Health, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Woman's and Child's Health, Padova University Hospital, Padua, Italy.
Front Pediatr. 2022 Jun 2;10:886450. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.886450. eCollection 2022.
Endotracheal intubation in neonates is challenging and requires a high level of precision, due to narrow and short airways, especially in preterm newborns. The current gold standard for endotracheal tube (ETT) verification is chest X-ray (CXR); however, this method presents some limitations, such as ionizing radiation exposure and delayed in obtaining the radiographic images, that point of care ultrasound (POCUS) could overcome.
To evaluate ultrasound efficacy in determining ETT placement adequacy in preterm and term newborns.
To compare the time required for ultrasound confirmation vs. time needed for other standard of care methods.
A search in Medline, PubMed, Google Scholar and in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) was performed. Our most recent search was conducted in September 2021 including the following keywords: "newborn", "infant", "neonate", "endotracheal intubation", "endotracheal tube", "ultrasonography", "ultrasound".
We considered randomized and non-randomized controlled trials, prospective, retrospective and cross-sectional studies published after 2012, involving neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients needing intubation/intubated infants and evaluating POCUS efficacy and/or accuracy in detecting ETT position vs. a defined gold-standard method. Three review authors independently assessed the studies' quality and extracted data.
We identified 14 eligible studies including a total of 602 ETT evaluations in NICU or in the delivery room. In about 80% of cases the gold standard for ETT position verification was CXR. Ultrasound was able to identify the presence of ETT in 96.8% of the evaluations, with a pooled POCUS sensitivity of 93.44% (95% CI: 90.4-95.75%) in detecting an appropriately positioned ETT as assessed by CXR. Bedside ultrasound confirmation was also found to be significantly faster compared to obtaining a CXR.
POCUS appears to be a fast and effective technique to identify correct endotracheal intubation in newborns. This review could add value and importance to the use of this promising technique.
由于气道狭窄且短,尤其是早产儿,新生儿气管插管具有挑战性,需要高度精确性。目前气管内导管(ETT)验证的金标准是胸部X线(CXR);然而,这种方法存在一些局限性,如电离辐射暴露和获取放射影像延迟,而床旁超声(POCUS)可以克服这些问题。
评估超声在确定早产儿和足月儿ETT放置是否合适方面的有效性。
比较超声确认所需时间与其他标准护理方法所需时间。
在Medline、PubMed、谷歌学术和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)中进行了检索。我们最近一次检索于2021年9月进行,包括以下关键词:“新生儿”“婴儿”“新生儿”“气管插管”“气管内导管”“超声检查”“超声”。
我们纳入了2012年后发表的随机和非随机对照试验、前瞻性、回顾性和横断面研究,这些研究涉及需要插管的新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)患者/已插管婴儿,并评估POCUS在检测ETT位置方面相对于既定金标准方法的有效性和/或准确性。三位综述作者独立评估研究质量并提取数据。
我们确定了14项符合条件的研究,共包括NICU或产房内602次ETT评估。在约80%的病例中,ETT位置验证的金标准是CXR。超声能够在96.8%的评估中识别出ETT的存在,通过CXR评估,检测位置合适的ETT时,POCUS的合并敏感性为93.44%(95%CI:90.4-95.75%)。还发现床旁超声确认比获取CXR明显更快。
POCUS似乎是一种快速有效的技术,可以识别新生儿正确的气管插管。本综述可为使用这种有前景的技术增添价值和重要性。