12222David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Surgical & Perioperative Careline, Department of Surgery, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Am Surg. 2022 Oct;88(10):2561-2564. doi: 10.1177/00031348221109464. Epub 2022 Jun 19.
Access to surgical service is limited by provider availability and geographic barriers. Telemedicine ensures that patients can access medical care.
The objective is to describe our use of telemedicine in delivering vascular surgery services to remote locations before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
We conducted a retrospective chart review analyzing care delivered at six vascular surgery telemedicine clinics over a 22-month period. We examined vascular diagnoses, recommended interventions, referrals placed, and emergency department visits within 30 days of evaluation. We calculated travel distance saved for patients between their local clinic and our main hospital.
We identified 94 patients and 144 telemedicine visits, with an average of 1.5 visits per patient (SD = 0.73). The most common referrals were for peripheral artery disease (20.2%) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (14.9%). Three patients were immediately referred to the emergency department due to concern for acute limb ischemia (2) or questionable symptomatic AAA (1). Telemedicine visit recommendations were distributed between no intervention (n = 30, 31.9%), medical management (n = 41, 43.6%), and surgical intervention (n = 23, 24.5%).The surgical intervention cohort was most commonly referred to arterial revascularization (n = 4), venous ablation (n = 4), and arteriovenous fistula procedures (n = 4). Fourteen patients came to our main hospital for surgery and four to local providers. Average travel distance saved per telemedicine visit was 104 miles (SD = 43.7).
Telemedicine provided safe, efficient care during the COVID-19 pandemic and saved patients an average of 104 travel miles per visit.
手术服务的可及性受到提供者可用性和地理障碍的限制。远程医疗确保患者能够获得医疗服务。
本研究旨在描述在 COVID-19 大流行之前和期间,我们如何利用远程医疗为远程地点提供血管外科学服务。
我们对在 22 个月内进行的 6 次血管外科学远程医疗诊所的护理进行了回顾性图表分析。我们检查了血管诊断、推荐的干预措施、转诊情况以及评估后 30 天内的急诊就诊情况。我们计算了患者在当地诊所和我们的主要医院之间节省的旅行距离。
我们确定了 94 名患者和 144 次远程医疗就诊,每位患者的平均就诊次数为 1.5 次(SD=0.73)。最常见的转诊是外周动脉疾病(20.2%)和腹主动脉瘤(14.9%)。由于担心急性肢体缺血(2 例)或可疑症状性 AAA(1 例),有 3 例患者立即转至急诊。远程医疗就诊建议分布在无干预(n=30,31.9%)、药物治疗(n=41,43.6%)和手术干预(n=23,24.5%)之间。手术干预组最常被转诊进行动脉血运重建(n=4)、静脉消融(n=4)和动静脉瘘手术(n=4)。14 名患者前往我们的主要医院接受手术,4 名患者前往当地医院。每次远程医疗就诊平均节省的旅行距离为 104 英里(SD=43.7)。
远程医疗在 COVID-19 大流行期间提供了安全、有效的护理,每次就诊平均为患者节省了 104 英里的旅行距离。