Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Brachytherapy. 2022 Sep-Oct;21(5):599-604. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2022.04.006. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: To compare toxicity profiles of low-dose rate (LDR) and high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost combined with ultra-hypofractionated external beam radiation therapy (UH-EBRT).
MATERIALS/METHODS: 99 patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer underwent an HDR (n = 59) or LDR (n = 40) boost combined with UH-EBRT (5 Gy x 5) . HDR (Ir-192) was delivered a single dose (15 Gy) and LDR (Pd-103) prescription dose was 100 Gy. Median baseline IPSS was 5 for both cohorts. Median follow-up was 29.3mos. Cumulative incidences were calculated for toxicity. Fisher exact tests were used to evaluate associations.
Overall incidence of grade 2 genitourinary toxicity for the entire cohort at 12 and 24 months was 21% and 29%, respectively. The incidence of grade 2 genitourinary toxicity at 12 and 24 months was higher for LDR cohort compared with HDR cohort (45% vs 5.1% and 55% vs 11%; p<0.001). On MVA, only treatment regimen (LDR versus HDR) was associated with grade 2+ genitourinary toxicity (p<0.001). Two patients experienced grade 2 rectal toxicity in each cohort. No grade > 3 toxicities were observed.
Both LDR and HDR brachytherapy combined with UH-EBRT had favorable toxicity profiles, but significantly less grade 2+ genitourinary toxicity was observed in patients receiving HDR.
比较低剂量率(LDR)和高剂量率(HDR)近距离放疗联合超分割外照射放疗(UH-EBRT)的毒性谱。
材料/方法:99 例中危前列腺癌患者接受 HDR(n=59)或 LDR(n=40)联合 UH-EBRT(5 Gy×5)的 boost 治疗。HDR(Ir-192)单次剂量为 15 Gy,LDR(Pd-103)处方剂量为 100 Gy。两组基线 IPSS 中位数均为 5。中位随访时间为 29.3 个月。计算毒性的累积发生率。采用 Fisher 确切检验评估相关性。
整个队列在 12 个月和 24 个月时,2 级泌尿生殖系统毒性的总发生率分别为 21%和 29%。LDR 队列在 12 个月和 24 个月时 2 级泌尿生殖系统毒性的发生率高于 HDR 队列(45%比 5.1%和 55%比 11%;p<0.001)。在多变量分析中,只有治疗方案(LDR 与 HDR)与 2 级+泌尿生殖系统毒性相关(p<0.001)。两组各有 2 例患者发生 2 级直肠毒性。未观察到>3 级毒性。
LDR 和 HDR 近距离放疗联合 UH-EBRT 的毒性谱均良好,但接受 HDR 治疗的患者 2 级+泌尿生殖系统毒性明显较少。