Suppr超能文献

我爱你爱我的方式:回应伴侣的爱情语言偏好会提升浪漫异性恋伴侣的满意度。

I love the way you love me: Responding to partner's love language preferences boosts satisfaction in romantic heterosexual couples.

机构信息

Doctoral School of Social Sciences, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jun 22;17(6):e0269429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269429. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Chapman's Love Languages hypothesis claims that (1) people vary in the ways they prefer to receive and express affection and (2) romantic partners who communicate their feelings congruent with their partner's preferences experience greater relationship quality. The author proposes five distinct preferences and tendencies for expressing love, including: Acts of Service, Physical Touch, Words of Affirmation, Quality Time and Gifts. In the present study partners (N = 100 heterosexual couples) completed measures assessing their preferences and behavioral tendencies for a) expressions of love and b) reception of signs of affection, for each of the five proposed "love languages". Relationship satisfaction, sexual satisfaction and empathy were also assessed. The degree of the within-couple mismatch was calculated separately for each individual based on the discrepancies between the person's felt (preferred) and their partner's expressed love language. The joint mismatch indicator was a sum of discrepancies across the five love languages. Matching on love languages was associated with both relationship and sexual satisfaction. In particular, people who expressed their affection in the way their partners preferred to receive it, experienced greater satisfaction with their relationships and were more sexually satisfied compared to those who met their partner's needs to lesser extent. Empathy was expected to be a critical factor for better understanding of and responding to the partner's needs. Results provided some support for this hypothesis among male but not female participants.

摘要

查普曼的爱情语言假说声称

(1)人们在接收和表达感情的方式上存在差异;(2)与伴侣的偏好一致地表达感情的浪漫伴侣会体验到更高的关系质量。作者提出了五种表达爱的独特偏好和倾向,包括:服务行为、身体接触、肯定的话语、高质量的时间和礼物。在本研究中,参与者(N=100 对异性恋伴侣)完成了评估他们对爱的表达和接受五种“爱情语言”的喜好和行为倾向的测量。还评估了关系满意度、性满意度和同理心。根据个人感受到的(偏好的)和伴侣表达的爱情语言之间的差异,分别为每个人计算了伴侣之间的不匹配程度。联合不匹配指标是五种爱情语言差异的总和。爱情语言的匹配与关系和性满意度都有关。特别是,与那些在较小程度上满足伴侣需求的人相比,用伴侣喜欢的方式表达感情的人对他们的关系更满意,性满意度更高。同理心被认为是更好地理解和回应伴侣需求的关键因素。这一假设在男性参与者中得到了一定程度的支持,但在女性参与者中则没有得到支持。

相似文献

1
I love the way you love me: Responding to partner's love language preferences boosts satisfaction in romantic heterosexual couples.
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 22;17(6):e0269429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269429. eCollection 2022.
4
Affection preference, enactment, and relationship satisfaction: A dyadic analysis of love languages.
J Marital Fam Ther. 2023 Oct;49(4):741-761. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12655. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
5
Body Image Projection Bias in Heterosexual Romantic Relationships: A Dyadic Investigation.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2022 Jul;48(7):987-1004. doi: 10.1177/01461672211025202. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
6
Half Empty Half Full? Biased Perceptions of Compassionate Love and Effects of Dyadic Complementarity.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Oct;50(10):1423-1437. doi: 10.1177/01461672231171986. Epub 2023 May 26.
8
Responsiveness and Relationship Satisfaction in Couples Coping With Parkinson's Disease: A Pilot Study.
Psychol Rep. 2022 Apr;125(2):804-821. doi: 10.1177/0033294121998032. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
9
Swings and roundabouts: management of jealousy in heterosexual swinging couples.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2007 Jun;46(Pt 2):459-76. doi: 10.1348/014466606X143153.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric evaluation of the abbreviated Hungarian Faking Orgasm Scale for Women.
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 12;15:1513959. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1513959. eCollection 2024.
2
"Something we can all share": Exploring the social significance of food insecurity for young people in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 May 28;4(5):e0003137. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003137. eCollection 2024.
3
Exploring the association between sexual motivation and quality of life in China and the United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 20;18(12):e0293566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293566. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Using spectral and cross-spectral analysis to identify patterns and synchrony in couples' sexual desire.
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 17;13(10):e0205330. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205330. eCollection 2018.
2
Similarity in Chronotype and Preferred Time for Sex and Its Role in Relationship Quality and Sexual Satisfaction.
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 4;9:443. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00443. eCollection 2018.
3
Empathic accuracy and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analytic review.
J Fam Psychol. 2017 Sep;31(6):742-752. doi: 10.1037/fam0000320. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
4
The Role of Cognitive and Affective Empathy in Spouses' Support Interactions: An Observational Study.
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 24;11(2):e0149944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149944. eCollection 2016.
5
Longitudinal Associations Among Relationship Satisfaction, Sexual Satisfaction, and Frequency of Sex in Early Marriage.
Arch Sex Behav. 2016 Jan;45(1):85-97. doi: 10.1007/s10508-014-0444-6. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
6
Sexual kindred spirits: actual and overperceived similarity, complementarity, and partner accuracy in heterosexual couples.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2014 Oct;40(10):1316-29. doi: 10.1177/0146167214542801. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
7
The honeymoon effect: does it exist and can it be predicted?
Prev Sci. 2015 May;16(4):550-9. doi: 10.1007/s11121-014-0480-4.
9
Prosocial spending and well-being: cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Apr;104(4):635-52. doi: 10.1037/a0031578. Epub 2013 Feb 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验