Frank Richard G, Shim Ruth S
Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, and Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C. (Frank); Department of Psychiatry, University of California, Davis, Sacramento (Shim).
Psychiatr Serv. 2023 Feb 1;74(2):182-187. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220097. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
Lack of accountability contributes to the gap between best practices and potential outcomes. Few mental health providers routinely practice evidence-based care. In fact, within the mental health field, there is significant controversy over the use of evidence-based practices. Lack of accountability affects individuals receiving care at the patient level, provider level, and systems level. The authors identify several impediments to accountability in behavioral health care. These include failure to develop a diverse, well-trained workforce; challenges in measurement; misalignment of payment incentives; and misguided regulations. Accountability arrangements typically consist of several elements: a clear articulation of goals, objectives, or standards; metrics so that progress toward achieving goals can be tracked; and consequences for insurers, providers, and professionals for achieving or failing to achieve objectives. To advance system goals, the full complement of accountability tools should be consistently applied to all sources of behavioral health care and supports. The authors focus on three sets of accountability tools-performance metrics, payment incentives, and regulatory standards-that when implemented thoughtfully can help move the field toward more positive outcomes in behavioral health.
缺乏问责制导致了最佳实践与潜在结果之间的差距。很少有心理健康服务提供者经常采用循证护理。事实上,在心理健康领域,对于循证实践的使用存在重大争议。缺乏问责制在患者层面、提供者层面和系统层面影响着接受护理的个体。作者指出了行为健康护理中问责制的几个障碍。这些障碍包括未能培养出多样化、训练有素的劳动力;测量方面的挑战;支付激励措施的不一致;以及被误导的监管规定。问责安排通常由几个要素组成:对目标、目的或标准的清晰阐述;用于跟踪实现目标进展情况的指标;以及对保险公司、提供者和专业人员实现或未实现目标的后果。为了推进系统目标,应始终如一地将全套问责工具应用于行为健康护理和支持的所有来源。作者重点关注三组问责工具——绩效指标、支付激励措施和监管标准——如果深思熟虑地实施,这些工具可以帮助该领域在行为健康方面取得更积极的成果。