Lecturer in human rights advocacy at Sheffield Hallam University, United Kingdom.
Health Hum Rights. 2022 Jun;24(1):159-169.
Brazilian citizens have a constitutional right to health. This right has also been a powerful instrument in the judicial enforcement of drug dependence treatment in Brazil. This study reviews a sample of decisions from the state of São Paulo and provides evidence that the right to health has been used to justify compulsory admission to treatment for people deemed to have a drug use disorder. These claims are filed against the state, mainly by families, who argue that the right to health of individuals is being violated. This model of litigation-oriented toward the satisfaction of a presumed health care need-does not engage sufficiently with individual informed consent and participation in the delivery of treatment, as a person-centered approach would demand. Further, the judgments reveal a low level of awareness among judges about the procedural rights of people ordered to undergo compulsory treatment, despite the large-scale implementation of the right to health via courts in Brazil. This problematic interpretation of the right to health, in the context of mounting punitive policies and ideology in Brazil, can be harmful to people who use drugs and bring about an environment of more limited patient safeguards.
巴西公民享有健康权。这一权利也是巴西在司法上强制实施药物依赖治疗的有力工具。本研究回顾了来自圣保罗州的一份决策样本,提供了证据表明,健康权已被用来为被认为患有药物使用障碍的人强制接受治疗辩护。这些诉求是针对州政府提出的,主要由家庭提出,他们认为个人的健康权受到了侵犯。这种以满足所谓医疗保健需求为导向的诉讼模式,没有充分考虑到以个人为中心的方法所要求的个人知情同意和参与治疗。此外,尽管巴西通过法院大规模实施健康权,但判决显示法官对被命令接受强制治疗的人的程序权利的认识水平较低。在巴西惩罚性政策和意识形态不断增加的背景下,对健康权的这种有问题的解释可能对吸毒者有害,并带来更有限的患者保障环境。