Frandsen Jeffrey J, Quinlan Noah J, Smith Karch M, Lu Chao-Chin, Chalmers Peter N, Tashjian Robert Z
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S.A.
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Apr 20;4(3):e1091-e1096. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.03.006. eCollection 2022 Jun.
To determine the likelihood of and risk factors for tear progression among patients with a symptomatic partial or full-thickness rotator cuff tears (RCTs) who return with continued shoulder pain and obtain subsequent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to identify various patient factors and MRI findings associated with rotator cuff tear progression.
We performed a retrospective review of MRI studies from Veteran's Affair patients with conservatively treated partial- or full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Patient characteristics and demographics were obtained via chart review. Tear characteristics were measured on MRI obtained a minimum of 1 year apart. We defined progression as either (1) an increase from a partial to a full-thickness tear or (2) an increase in tear width or retraction of at least 5 mm. Statistical analysis using χ, Fisher exact, Student , and Mann-Whitney test was then performed as appropriate, looking for factors involved in RCT progression.
We evaluated 412 MRI studies from 206 Veteran's Affair patients with conservatively treated partial- or full-thickness rotator cuff tears from October 1999 to March 2020. Overall, 61% of RCTs had progressed at a mean of 3.2 ± 2.3 years follow-up. Among all patients, 74% of full-thickness tears progressed in size, 42% of partial-thickness tears progressed in size, and 29% of partial-thickness tears progressed to full-thickness tears. On univariate analysis, full-thickness tears ( < .001), disruption of the anterior rotator cuff cable ( = .001), subscapularis involvement ( = .004), tear retraction ( < .001), and tear width ( < .001) all increased the likelihood of progression. On multivariate analysis, full-thickness tears ( < .001) and subscapularis involvement ( = .045) were correlated with progression.
RCTs progress over time in terms of size of tear and from partial- to full-thickness tears. There is an increased risk of tear progression in patients with full-thickness tears when compared with partial-thickness tears along with subscapularis tear involvement. Rates of progression are larger than previously reported rates for both partial- and full-thickness tears, noting that our study population were those patients who continued to be symptomatic from their tears.
Level IV, prognostic case series.
确定有症状的部分或全层肩袖撕裂(RCT)患者在持续存在肩部疼痛并接受后续磁共振成像(MRI)检查后撕裂进展的可能性及危险因素,并识别与肩袖撕裂进展相关的各种患者因素和MRI表现。
我们对退伍军人事务部接受保守治疗的部分或全层肩袖撕裂患者的MRI研究进行了回顾性分析。通过病历审查获取患者特征和人口统计学信息。在至少相隔1年的MRI上测量撕裂特征。我们将进展定义为以下两种情况之一:(1)从部分撕裂增加为全层撕裂;或(2)撕裂宽度增加或回缩至少5毫米。然后根据情况进行χ检验、Fisher精确检验、Student检验和Mann-Whitney检验等统计分析,寻找与RCT进展相关的因素。
我们评估了1999年10月至2020年3月期间206例退伍军人事务部接受保守治疗的部分或全层肩袖撕裂患者的412份MRI研究。总体而言,在平均3.2±2.3年的随访中,61%的RCT出现了进展。在所有患者中,74%的全层撕裂在大小上有进展,42%的部分撕裂在大小上有进展,29%的部分撕裂进展为全层撕裂。单因素分析显示,全层撕裂(P<0.001)、肩袖前束中断(P=0.001)、肩胛下肌受累(P=0.004)、撕裂回缩(P<0.001)和撕裂宽度(P<0.001)均增加了进展的可能性。多因素分析显示,全层撕裂(P<0.001)和肩胛下肌受累(P=0.045)与进展相关。
RCT会随着时间在撕裂大小方面以及从部分撕裂发展为全层撕裂方面出现进展。与部分撕裂相比,全层撕裂患者以及伴有肩胛下肌撕裂的患者撕裂进展风险增加。进展率高于先前报道的部分和全层撕裂的进展率,需注意我们的研究人群是那些因撕裂而持续有症状的患者。
IV级,预后病例系列。