Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Nutrition and Health Innovation Research Institute, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia.
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jun 25;22(1):521. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03207-z.
Very few older adults meet current muscle strengthening exercise guidelines, and several barriers exist to supervised, community-based resistance exercise programs. Older adults therefore require access to feasible resistance exercise modalities that may be performed remotely. This pilot study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of undertaking a four-week home-based resistance 'exercise snacking' intervention (performed either once, twice, or thrice daily) when delivered and monitored remotely in older adults. METHODS: Thirty-eight community-dwelling older adults [mean ± SD age 69.8 ± 3.8 y, 63% female] were randomised to complete resistance 'exercise snacks' (9-minute sessions) either once (n = 9), twice (n = 10), or thrice (n = 9) daily, or allocated to usual-activity control (n = 10). Exercise adherence and adverse events were assessed using an exercise diary, and acceptability of the intervention was explored using an online questionnaire. Physical function [balance, 5-times sit-to-stand (STS), and 30-second STS tests] was assessed remotely at baseline and follow-up using videoconferencing.
The intervention was feasible and safe, with 100% participant retention, high adherence (97, 82, and 81% for once, twice, and thrice daily, respectively), and only two adverse events from a total of 1317 'exercise snacking' sessions. The exercise intervention was rated as enjoyable (75% reported their enjoyment as ≥4 on a 5-point Likert scale), easy to perform, and most (82%) planned to continue similar exercise at home. We also found it was feasible to assess measures of physical function via videoconferencing, although effect sizes for 4-week changes in both 5-STS (d range, 0.4-1.4) and 30-STS (d range, 0.7-0.9) following the exercise intervention were similar to controls (d = 1.1 and 1.0 for 5-STS and 30-STS, respectively).
Resistance 'exercise snacking' may be a feasible strategy for engaging older adults in home-based resistance exercise when delivered and monitored remotely. The findings of this pilot feasibility trial support the need for longer-term studies in larger cohorts to determine the effectiveness of resistance 'exercise snacking' approaches for improving physical function in older adults.
The trial was retrospectively registered on 10/11/2021 with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ( ACTRN12621001538831 ).
很少有老年人符合当前的肌肉强化运动指南,而监督社区基础抗阻运动项目存在多种障碍。因此,老年人需要获得可行的抗阻运动方式,这些方式可能可以远程进行。本研究旨在评估当远程提供和监测时,老年人进行为期四周的家庭基础抗阻“运动零食”干预(每天进行一次、两次或三次)的可行性和可接受性。
38 名社区居住的老年人[平均年龄(SD)69.8±3.8 岁,63%为女性]被随机分配进行抗阻“运动零食”(9 分钟/次),每天一次(n=9)、两次(n=10)或三次(n=9),或分配到常规活动对照组(n=10)。使用运动日记评估运动依从性和不良事件,使用在线问卷评估干预的可接受性。使用视频会议在基线和随访时远程评估身体功能[平衡、5 次坐站(STS)和 30 秒 STS 测试]。
该干预措施是可行和安全的,100%的参与者保留率,高依从性(分别为 97%、82%和 81%),1317 次“运动零食”中仅有两例不良事件。运动干预被评为令人愉快(75%的人在 5 分制的 Likert 量表上报告其愉悦度≥4),易于执行,大多数(82%)人计划在家中继续类似的运动。我们还发现通过视频会议评估身体功能指标是可行的,尽管运动干预后 5-STS(d 范围,0.4-1.4)和 30-STS(d 范围,0.7-0.9)的 4 周变化的效应大小与对照组相似(5-STS 和 30-STS 的 d 值分别为 1.1 和 1.0)。
当远程提供和监测时,抗阻“运动零食”可能是一种让老年人参与家庭抗阻运动的可行策略。这项初步可行性研究的结果支持在更大的队列中进行更长期研究的需要,以确定抗阻“运动零食”方法改善老年人身体功能的有效性。
该试验于 2021 年 11 月 10 日在澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心(ANZCTR)(ACTRN12621001538831)进行了回顾性注册。