Sports Medicine Division, Department of Orthopedics, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.
Clin J Sport Med. 2022 Jul 1;32(4):368-374. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000977. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
To evaluate whether delay in the diagnosis of pelvic avulsion fractures in young athletes leads to prolonged treatment and prolonged return toward sport activities, whether fractures at certain locations are associated with a greater risk of diagnostic delay, and what reasons may exist for delay in diagnosis.
Retrospective chart review of young patients who presented with pelvic region avulsion fracture to a community-based sports medicine clinic over a 19-year period.
Private practice, primary care sports medicine clinic.
Patients younger than 20 years diagnosed with pelvic region avulsion fracture.
None, this was a retrospective study.
Clearance for return toward sport activities.
Two hundred twenty-five cases were reviewed for reasons for delay in diagnosis; 208 cases met criteria for the duration of treatment and return to play activities portions of the study. The mean time from date of injury diagnosis was 19.59 days, and the mean duration from date of injury to clearance for return to play advancement was 67.20 days. Duration of treatment varied slightly depending on timing of diagnosis, whereas duration from date of injury to clearance for return to play advancement varied greatly depending on diagnostic delay. Those who did not sense a "pop" at the time of injury were more likely to experience diagnostic delay, as were athletes with ischial tuberosity fractures. The most common cause of diagnostic delay was patient/family decision on when to seek care; misdiagnosis as a muscle strain was also common.
Diagnostic delay of adolescent pelvic avulsion fractures may unnecessarily prevent athletes from returning to play within an optimal time frame. Our observations highlight a need for educating athletes and their families on when to seek initial or follow-up medical care as well as educating medical providers regarding the diagnosis of pelvic avulsion fractures.
评估年轻运动员骨盆撕脱骨折的诊断延迟是否会导致治疗时间延长和重返运动活动时间延长,特定部位的骨折是否与更大的诊断延迟风险相关,以及可能存在哪些诊断延迟的原因。
对 19 年来在一家社区为基础的运动医学诊所就诊的年轻患者出现骨盆区域撕脱骨折的情况进行回顾性图表审查。
私人执业,初级保健运动医学诊所。
年龄小于 20 岁,被诊断为骨盆区域撕脱骨折的患者。
无,这是一项回顾性研究。
重返运动活动的许可。
为了诊断延迟的原因,共审查了 225 例病例;208 例符合研究中治疗持续时间和重返运动活动部分的标准。从损伤诊断日期到恢复运动活动许可的平均时间为 19.59 天,从损伤日期到恢复运动活动许可的平均时间为 67.20 天。治疗持续时间因诊断时间而异,而从损伤日期到恢复运动活动许可的时间因诊断延迟而异。受伤时没有感觉到“爆裂”声的患者更有可能出现诊断延迟,坐骨结节骨折的运动员也是如此。诊断延迟的最常见原因是患者/家属决定何时寻求治疗;误诊为肌肉拉伤也很常见。
青少年骨盆撕脱骨折的诊断延迟可能会不必要地阻止运动员在最佳时间框架内重返运动。我们的观察结果强调了需要教育运动员及其家属何时寻求初始或后续医疗护理的重要性,以及教育医疗提供者关于骨盆撕脱骨折的诊断。