Suppr超能文献

跨文化翻译与验证 Lasater 临床判断量表©。

Transcultural Translation and Validation of Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric©.

机构信息

Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Instituto Ciências da Saúde de Lisboa. Lisboa, Portugal.

Centro Hospitalar de Leiria. Leiria, Portugal.

出版信息

Rev Bras Enferm. 2022 Jun 24;75(6):e20210880. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0880. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

to translate and cross-culturally validate the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric© (LCJR©) instrument for nursing students.

METHODS

the application of LCJR-PT© was preceded by a linguistic translation into Portuguese, based on the translation-back-translation method. This psychometric study involved 32 nursing students from a program in Portugal. Data were collected through observations of two independent observers during the performance of the practices developed by the students, through the scenarios validated by experts of high and of medium-fidelity simulation.

RESULTS

of the 64 observations obtained from the practices of nursing students, the value of intra-class correlations in the 4 aspects of the instrument exceeded 0.792. There was a global Cronbach's alpha of LCJR-PT© of 0.921 and 0.876 in Observers 1 and 2 respectively, with a statistically significant level of agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

the LCJR-PT© is a valid and reliable instrument, demonstrating a high potential for its use in clinical education and nursing research.

摘要

目的

将 Lasater 临床判断量表(LCJR)翻译并跨文化验证,适用于护理专业学生。

方法

LCJR-PT 的应用,首先是基于翻译-回译的方法,将其翻译成葡萄牙语。该心理测量研究涉及葡萄牙一个项目的 32 名护理专业学生。数据通过两位独立观察者在学生开展的实践活动中进行观察收集,通过高保真度和中保真度模拟的专家验证的场景进行收集。

结果

从护理学生的实践中获得的 64 次观察中,该工具的 4 个方面的组内相关系数均超过 0.792。LCJR-PT 的总体 Cronbach's alpha 值分别为 0.921 和 0.876,观察者 1 和 2 的一致性具有统计学意义。

结论

LCJR-PT 是一种有效且可靠的工具,在临床教育和护理研究方面具有很高的应用潜力。

相似文献

1
Transcultural Translation and Validation of Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric©.
Rev Bras Enferm. 2022 Jun 24;75(6):e20210880. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0880. eCollection 2022.
2
The Korean version of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric: a validation study.
Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Jan;35(1):68-72. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.06.009. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
3
Development and validation of Dutch version of Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric in hospital practice: An instrument design study.
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Mar;62:43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.013. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
4
Cultural adaptation and validation of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric in nursing students in Spain.
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 May;64:71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
6
Psychometric properties of the lasater clinical judgment rubric.
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2013 Apr 23;10:/j/ijnes.2013.10.issue-1/ijnes-2012-0030/ijnes-2012-0030.xml. doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2012-0030.
7
Assessing the reliability, validity, and use of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric: three approaches.
J Nurs Educ. 2012 Feb;51(2):66-73. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20111130-03. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
8
Validation of a new assessment tool for a pediatric nursing simulation module.
J Nurs Educ. 2014 Nov 1;53(11):623-9. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20141023-04. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
10
Psychometric properties of the virtual patient version of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric.
Nurse Educ Pract. 2019 Jul;38:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2019.05.016. Epub 2019 May 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Lasater clinical judgment rubric in nursing education: a Turkish validity and reliability study.
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jan 20;24(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02679-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychometric properties of the virtual patient version of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric.
Nurse Educ Pract. 2019 Jul;38:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2019.05.016. Epub 2019 May 28.
3
Cultural adaptation and validation of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric in nursing students in Spain.
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 May;64:71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
5
Development and validation of Dutch version of Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric in hospital practice: An instrument design study.
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Mar;62:43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.013. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
7
The impact of simulation sequencing on perceived clinical decision making.
Nurse Educ Pract. 2017 Sep;26:33-38. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
8
Impact of high-fidelity simulation on the development of clinical judgment and motivation among Lebanese nursing students.
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Nov;46:36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.08.026. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
9
Barriers and enablers to the use of high-fidelity patient simulation manikins in nurse education: an integrative review.
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Jan;36:281-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.08.005. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
10
The Korean version of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric: a validation study.
Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Jan;35(1):68-72. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.06.009. Epub 2014 Jul 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验