Suppr超能文献

经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗门静脉高压症后的抗凝治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Anticoagulation after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for portal hypertension: A systematic review and meta analysis.

机构信息

Interventional Radiology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Three Gorges University, Yichang, China.

Interventional Radiology Department, YiChang Central People's Hospital, Yichang, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jul 1;101(26):e29742. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029742.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is widely applied to decrease portal hypertension. Because of the lack of strong evidence, it is controversial whether anticoagulation should be performed after TIPS. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation for patients with portal hypertension following TIPS.

METHODS

Studies making comparisons between combination treatment and TIPS alone were searched in China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Cochrane Library, PubMed, the Wan Fang electronic databases, and EMBASE, delivered between the earliest accessible date and September 4, 2021. The RevMan version 5.3 was applied to conduct all statistical analyses. I2 index statistic was used to assess heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Five eligible studies were selected, and total 707 patients were enrolled. According to the meta-analysis, compared to TIPS alone, TIPS + anticoagulation led to much lower incidence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT; odds ratio [OR] = 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18-0.84, P = .02) as well as low heterogeneity (P = 0.36, I2 = 3%). Other index like the stent dysfunction rate (OR = 1.27, 95% CI 0.71-2.77, P = .42), bleeding rate (OR = 1.27, 95% CI 0.71-2.77, P = .42), and incidence of hepatic encephalopathy (OR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.56-1.36, P = .55) showed no statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

In certain patients with portal hypertension, anticoagulation following TIPS may not be required. However, for patients who do not have a PVT before TIPS, post-TIPS anticoagulation can decrease the incidence of PVT. Nonetheless, further research is still required.

摘要

背景

经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)广泛应用于降低门静脉高压。由于缺乏强有力的证据,TIPS 后是否应该进行抗凝治疗存在争议。本荟萃分析旨在评估 TIPS 后门静脉高压患者抗凝治疗的安全性和有效性。

方法

在中国知网、 Cochrane 图书馆、PubMed、万方电子数据库和 EMBASE 中检索了比较联合治疗与 TIPS 单独治疗的研究,检索时间为最早可获得日期至 2021 年 9 月 4 日。使用 RevMan 版本 5.3 进行所有统计分析。采用 I2 指数统计评估异质性。

结果

纳入了 5 项合格研究,共纳入 707 例患者。根据荟萃分析,与 TIPS 单独治疗相比,TIPS+抗凝治疗导致门静脉血栓形成(PVT;优势比[OR] = 0.39,95%置信区间[CI] 0.18-0.84,P =.02)发生率显著降低,且异质性较低(P =.36,I2 = 3%)。其他指标,如支架功能障碍发生率(OR = 1.27,95%CI 0.71-2.77,P =.42)、出血发生率(OR = 1.27,95%CI 0.71-2.77,P =.42)和肝性脑病发生率(OR = 0.87,95%CI 0.56-1.36,P =.55)无统计学意义。

结论

在某些门静脉高压患者中,TIPS 后可能不需要抗凝治疗。然而,对于 TIPS 前没有 PVT 的患者,TIPS 后抗凝治疗可以降低 PVT 的发生率。但是,仍需要进一步的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e97/9239596/f35309112a13/medi-101-e29742-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验