Suppr超能文献

初次不稳定与单纯的头臼置换术后脱位明显相关。

Prior Instability is Strongly Associated With Dislocation After Isolated Head and Liner Exchange.

机构信息

New York University Langone Health, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York, New York.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2022 Dec;37(12):2412-2419. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.06.019. Epub 2022 Jul 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Isolated head and liner exchange is an appealing alternative to a more extensive revision total hip arthroplasty in patients who have well-fixed components. Despite efforts to increase femoral offset and restore soft tissue tensioning, limited component revision may be associated with higher rates of postoperative instability.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis assessed 209 patients who had a head and liner exchange conducted at a large academic medical center between 2011 and 2019 and had >2 years of follow-up. Functional cup positioning within the Lewinnek safe zone was assessed on postoperative weight-bearing radiographs. Included patients were 56% women, had a mean age of 64 years (range, 24-89) and a mean body mass index of 28.8 kg/m (range, 18.2-46.7). The most common indications for surgery included acetabular liner wear in 86 hips (41%), instability in 40 hips (19%), and infection in 36 hips (17%).

RESULTS

Twenty-eight hips (13%) had a dislocation within 2 years after surgery. The best-fit model predicting postoperative dislocation included a history of dislocation (adjusted-odds ratio [adj-OR] 5.67, 95% CI 2.39-14.09, P < .001), age (adj-OR 1.04 per 1-year increase, 95% CI 0.99-1.08, P = .10), and body mass index (adj-OR 0.90 per 1-kg/m increase, 95% CI 0.80-0.99, P = .046).

CONCLUSION

In a large cohort of patients who had isolated head and liner exchange, patients who had prior instability had 7-fold elevated odds of postoperative dislocation. This risk remains significant after controlling for cup positioning outside the Lewinnek safe zone, liner type, head size, neck length, soft tissue compromise, neuromuscular disease, and dual mobility constructs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective cohort study.

摘要

背景

在那些固定良好的组件的患者中,与更广泛的全髋关节翻修相比,单独更换头和衬垫是一种有吸引力的选择。尽管努力增加股骨偏移量并恢复软组织张力,但有限的组件翻修可能与更高的术后不稳定率相关。

方法

这项回顾性分析评估了 209 名患者,他们在一家大型学术医疗中心进行了头和衬垫置换,随访时间超过 2 年。在术后负重 X 线片上评估功能性杯在 Lewinnek 安全区内的定位。纳入的患者中 56%为女性,平均年龄 64 岁(范围,24-89 岁),平均体重指数为 28.8kg/m(范围,18.2-46.7)。最常见的手术指征包括髋臼衬垫磨损 86 髋(41%)、不稳定 40 髋(19%)和感染 36 髋(17%)。

结果

28 髋(13%)在术后 2 年内发生脱位。预测术后脱位的最佳拟合模型包括脱位史(调整优势比[adj-OR]5.67,95%CI2.39-14.09,P<.001)、年龄(adj-OR 每增加 1 岁 1.04,95%CI0.99-1.08,P=0.10)和体重指数(adj-OR 每增加 1kg/m 0.90,95%CI0.80-0.99,P=0.046)。

结论

在一项大型单独更换头和衬垫的患者队列中,既往不稳定的患者术后脱位的几率增加了 7 倍。在控制 Lewinnek 安全区以外的杯位置、衬垫类型、头尺寸、颈长度、软组织损伤、神经肌肉疾病和双活动构建物后,这种风险仍然显著。

证据水平

III 级,回顾性队列研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验