Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saccone G, Carugno J, Pacheco L A, Zizolfi B, Haimovich S, Clark T J
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2022 Jun;14(2):103-110. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.14.2.023.
Endometrial cancer is the most common gynaecological neoplasia in western countries. Diagnosis of endometrial cancer requires an endometrial biopsy. A good quality endometrial biopsy allows not only the identification of the pathology, but also preoperative histologic subtype classification. Endometrial biopsy can be performed under direct hysteroscopic visualisation, but also using blind sampling techniques.
To compare endometrial biopsy performed under direct hysteroscopic visualisation versus blind sampling for the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer.
Systematic review and meta-analysis. Electronic databases were searched from their inception until March 2022.We included all studies comparing endometrial biopsy performed under direct hysteroscopic visualisation versus blind endometrial sampling.
Sample adequacy, failure rate to detect endometrial cancer or endometrial hyperplasia, and rate of detection of endometrial cancer. The summary measures were reported as relative risk (RR) with 95% of confidence interval (CI).
Four studies with a total of 1,295 patients were included. Endometrial biopsy under direct hysteroscopic visualisation was associated with a significantly higher rate of sample adequacy (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.17), and significantly lower risk of failure to detect endometrial cancer or endometrial hyperplasia (RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.92) compared to blind endometrial sampling. However, there was no significant difference between endometrial biopsies taken under direct hysteroscopic visualisation or blindly, with or without a preceding diagnostic hysteroscopy, in the rate of detection of endometrial cancer (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.06).
Hysteroscopic endometrial biopsy under direct visualisation is associated with significantly higher rate of sample adequacy and is comparable to blind endometrial sampling for the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and precancer.
WHAT IS NEW?: Hysteroscopic endometrial biopsy under direct visualisation would be expected to reduce diagnostic failure for endometrial cancer compared to blind endometrial sampling.
子宫内膜癌是西方国家最常见的妇科肿瘤。子宫内膜癌的诊断需要进行子宫内膜活检。高质量的子宫内膜活检不仅能确定病理情况,还能进行术前组织学亚型分类。子宫内膜活检可在直接宫腔镜可视化下进行,也可采用盲取采样技术。
比较在直接宫腔镜可视化下进行的子宫内膜活检与盲取采样在诊断子宫内膜增生和癌症方面的效果。
系统评价和荟萃分析。检索电子数据库自创建至2022年3月的文献。我们纳入了所有比较在直接宫腔镜可视化下进行的子宫内膜活检与盲取子宫内膜采样的研究。
样本充足率、未能检测到子宫内膜癌或子宫内膜增生的失败率以及子宫内膜癌的检出率。汇总指标以相对风险(RR)及95%置信区间(CI)报告。
纳入四项研究,共1295例患者。与盲取子宫内膜采样相比,直接宫腔镜可视化下的子宫内膜活检样本充足率显著更高(RR 1.13,95% CI 1.10至1.17),未能检测到子宫内膜癌或子宫内膜增生的风险显著更低(RR 0.16,95% CI 0.03至0.92)。然而,无论是否先行诊断性宫腔镜检查,直接宫腔镜可视化下或盲取进行的子宫内膜活检在子宫内膜癌检出率方面无显著差异(RR 0.18,95% CI 0.03至1.06)。
直接可视化下的宫腔镜子宫内膜活检样本充足率显著更高,在诊断子宫内膜癌及癌前病变方面与盲取子宫内膜采样相当。
新发现是什么?:与盲取子宫内膜采样相比,直接可视化下的宫腔镜子宫内膜活检预计可降低子宫内膜癌的诊断失败率。