Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia - Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia - Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Psychiatry Res. 2022 Sep;315:114698. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114698. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
The pathological use of the Internet has surged during the pandemic, even though service provisions were negatively impacted. Telepsychiatry can be used as a solution to maintain psychiatric addiction services. This study examined the efficacy of online group dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT) for Internet addiction (IA), compared to cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Participants were divided into two arms for 8 weeks: the experimental arm received eight sessions of online DBT skill group training (n = 20), and the control arm received four sessions of online individual CBT (n = 20). All participants were required to complete a sociodemographic and Internet use survey, the Internet Addiction Test (IAT), and the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment (URICA). All participants completed the therapy. Of the 40 participants, six (15%) perceived the need for therapy and one (2.5%) participant had a history of seeking IA therapy. In the pre-post comparison, significant improvements were noted in the IAT and URICA scores as well as Internet use duration for both arms. No significant differences were observed across the arms and in the time-by-arm interaction. Online group DBT is a viable alternative to online CBT in an acute constrained setting, although further studies are required to scrutinize its long-term efficacy. Trial Registration: ISRCTN17273762.
在疫情期间,尽管服务受到负面影响,但互联网的病态使用却猛增。远程精神病学可以作为维持精神病成瘾服务的一种解决方案。本研究考察了在线团体辩证行为疗法(DBT)与认知行为疗法(CBT)相比治疗网络成瘾(IA)的疗效。参与者分为两个 8 周组:实验组接受 8 次在线 DBT 技能组培训(n=20),对照组接受 4 次在线个体 CBT(n=20)。所有参与者都需要完成一份社会人口学和互联网使用调查、网络成瘾测试(IAT)和罗德岛大学变化评估(URICA)。所有参与者都完成了治疗。在 40 名参与者中,有 6 名(15%)认为需要治疗,有 1 名(2.5%)参与者有过寻求 IA 治疗的病史。在前后比较中,两个组的 IAT 和 URICA 评分以及互联网使用时间都有显著改善。两组之间以及时间与手臂之间的交互作用均无显著差异。在急性受限环境下,在线团体 DBT 是在线 CBT 的可行替代方案,但需要进一步研究来仔细观察其长期疗效。试验注册:ISRCTN83067204。