Lim Sukchol, Nagai Yuzo, Nozawa Hiroaki, Kawai Kazushige, Sasaki Kazuhito, Murono Koji, Emoto Shigenobu, Yokoyama Yuichiro, Ozawa Tsuyoshi, Abe Shinya, Anzai Hiroyuki, Sonoda Hirofumi, Ishihara Soichiro
Department of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
Surg Today. 2023 Jan;53(1):109-115. doi: 10.1007/s00595-022-02537-0. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
We investigated the surgical outcomes of robotic low anterior resection (LAR) for lower rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (pCRT).
A total of 175 patients with lower rectal cancer who underwent LAR after pCRT between 2005 and 2020 were stratified into open (OS, n = 65), laparoscopic (LS, n = 64), and robotic surgery (RS, n = 46) groups. We compared the clinical, surgical, and pathological results among the three groups.
The RS and LS groups had less blood loss than the OS group (p < 0.0001). The operating time in the RS group was longer than in the LS and OS groups (p < 0.0001). The RS group had a significantly longer mean distal margin than the LS and OS groups (25.4 mm vs. 20.7 mm and 20.3 mm, respectively; p = 0.026). There was no significant difference in the postoperative complication rate among the groups. The local recurrence rate in the RS group was comparable to those in the LS and OS groups.
Robotic LAR after pCRT was performed safely for patients with advanced lower rectal cancer. It provided a longer distal margin and equivalent local control rates.
我们研究了术前放化疗(pCRT)后机器人辅助低位前切除术(LAR)治疗低位直肠癌的手术效果。
将2005年至2020年间175例低位直肠癌患者在接受pCRT后接受LAR手术的患者分为开放手术组(OS,n = 65)、腹腔镜手术组(LS,n = 64)和机器人手术组(RS,n = 46)。我们比较了三组的临床、手术和病理结果。
RS组和LS组的失血量均少于OS组(p < 0.0001)。RS组的手术时间长于LS组和OS组(p < 0.0001)。RS组的平均远端切缘明显长于LS组和OS组(分别为25.4 mm vs. 20.7 mm和20.3 mm;p = 0.026)。三组术后并发症发生率无显著差异。RS组的局部复发率与LS组和OS组相当。
对于晚期低位直肠癌患者,pCRT后行机器人辅助LAR手术是安全的。它提供了更长的远端切缘和相当的局部控制率。