Suppr超能文献

无菌性鹰嘴滑囊炎穿刺液的常规培养、细胞计数及晶体评估的效用。

The utility of routine cultures, cell count, and crystal evaluation of aspirate from aseptic olecranon bursitis.

作者信息

Bustamante Sebastian, Boin Michael, Dankert John, Adekanye David, Virk Mandeep S

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

JSES Int. 2022 Mar 18;6(4):709-712. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.02.012. eCollection 2022 Jul.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aspiration of the olecranon bursa is a treatment option for acute olecranon bursitis (OB). Typically, the aspirate is sent for microbiologic analysis, cell count, and crystal analysis. This study investigates the utility of fluid aspirate analysis from patients with clinically diagnosed aseptic OB.

METHODS

In this prospective study (IRB #i20-00986), patients presenting with acute aseptic OB were treated with aspiration as standard of care. Patients consented to participate in this study via phone. Patients with suspected infectious bursitis, open draining wound, and chronic OB were excluded. The aspirate was sent out for routine microbiologic analysis (aerobic and anaerobic cultures and Gram staining) and fluid analyses, including cell count with differential and crystal analysis. Nucleated and differential cell count was reported as absolute numbers per cubic millimeter and percentage, respectively. Compression wrap was applied after OB aspiration, and patients were asked to ice and take anti-inflammatory medications. Clinical follow-up was done after 6 weeks and at 3 months for resolution vs. recurrence of symptoms, and the mean time to resolution was reported.

RESULTS

A total of 26 patients (28 cases) with aseptic OB were enrolled in this study. Two patients had bilateral OB. The mean time to aspiration after the onset of symptoms was 26.4 days. One patient had recurrence of swelling after the first aspiration and underwent repeat bursa aspiration. No organisms were isolated or reported on Gram staining on any of the aspirate samples. Two aspirates were reported positive for calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystals. No patient had monosodium urate crystals. All patients had resolution of swelling and symptoms without the development of postaspiration infection.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates limited clinical utility of routine microbiologic analysis (cell count, microbiologic, and crystal evaluation) of fluid aspirate from clinically diagnosed aseptic OB. Although 7% of fluid aspirates were positive for calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystals, it did not change the overall treatment.

摘要

背景

鹰嘴滑囊炎穿刺抽吸是急性鹰嘴滑囊炎(OB)的一种治疗选择。通常,抽吸液会送去进行微生物学分析、细胞计数和晶体分析。本研究调查临床诊断为无菌性OB患者的液体抽吸分析的效用。

方法

在这项前瞻性研究(IRB编号:i20 - 00986)中,表现为急性无菌性OB的患者接受穿刺抽吸作为标准治疗。患者通过电话同意参与本研究。排除疑似感染性滑囊炎、开放性引流伤口和慢性OB患者。抽吸液送去进行常规微生物学分析(需氧和厌氧培养及革兰氏染色)和液体分析,包括细胞计数及分类和晶体分析。有核细胞和分类细胞计数分别报告为每立方毫米的绝对数和百分比。OB穿刺抽吸后应用压迫包扎,要求患者冰敷并服用抗炎药物。6周和3个月后进行临床随访,观察症状缓解与复发情况,并报告平均缓解时间。

结果

本研究共纳入26例(28个病例)无菌性OB患者。2例患者为双侧OB。症状出现后至穿刺抽吸的平均时间为26.4天。1例患者首次穿刺抽吸后肿胀复发,接受了重复滑囊穿刺抽吸。所有抽吸样本的革兰氏染色均未分离或报告有微生物。2份抽吸液报告焦磷酸钙二水合物晶体阳性。无患者有尿酸钠晶体。所有患者肿胀和症状均缓解,未发生穿刺抽吸后感染。

结论

本研究表明,对临床诊断为无菌性OB患者的液体抽吸物进行常规微生物学分析(细胞计数、微生物学和晶体评估)的临床效用有限。虽然7%的液体抽吸物焦磷酸钙二水合物晶体呈阳性,但并未改变整体治疗。

相似文献

1
The utility of routine cultures, cell count, and crystal evaluation of aspirate from aseptic olecranon bursitis.
JSES Int. 2022 Mar 18;6(4):709-712. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.02.012. eCollection 2022 Jul.
4
Bilateral Olecranon Bursitis - A Rare Clinical presentation of Calcium Pyrophosphate Crystal Deposition Disease.
J Orthop Case Rep. 2014 Jan-Mar;4(1):3-6. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.137.
5
Non-surgical treatment of aseptic olecranon bursitis: A systematic review.
Reumatol Clin (Engl Ed). 2023 Nov;19(9):482-487. doi: 10.1016/j.reumae.2023.05.004.
6
7
Empirical Treatment of Uncomplicated Septic Olecranon Bursitis Without Aspiration.
J Hand Surg Am. 2020 Jan;45(1):20-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.06.012. Epub 2019 Aug 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Management of Olecranon Bursitis: A Review.
J Hand Surg Am. 2021 Jun;46(6):501-506. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.02.006. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
2
Management of septic bursitis.
Joint Bone Spine. 2019 Oct;86(5):583-588. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
3
Common Superficial Bursitis.
Am Fam Physician. 2017 Feb 15;95(4):224-231.
4
Olecranon bursitis: a systematic overview.
Shoulder Elbow. 2014 Jul;6(3):182-90. doi: 10.1177/1758573214532787. Epub 2014 May 6.
5
Olecranon bursitis.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Jan;25(1):158-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.08.032. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
6
Treatment of olecranon bursitis: a systematic review.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Nov;134(11):1517-36. doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-2088-3. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
7
Prepatellar and olecranon bursitis: literature review and development of a treatment algorithm.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Mar;134(3):359-70. doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1882-7. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
8
Diagnosis and management of olecranon bursitis.
Surgeon. 2012 Oct;10(5):297-300. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2012.02.002. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
9
Four common types of bursitis: diagnosis and management.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011 Jun;19(6):359-67. doi: 10.5435/00124635-201106000-00006.
10
Septic olecranon bursitis: recognition and treatment.
J Am Board Fam Pract. 1995 May-Jun;8(3):217-20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验