Hemorrhagic Stroke Research Program, J Philip Kistler Research Center, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Hemorrhagic Stroke Research Program, J Philip Kistler Research Center, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire (GHU) Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, Institut de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences de Paris, INSERM UMR-S1266, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Lancet Neurol. 2022 Aug;21(8):714-725. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00208-3.
Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is an age-related small vessel disease, characterised pathologically by progressive deposition of amyloid β in the cerebrovascular wall. The Boston criteria are used worldwide for the in-vivo diagnosis of CAA but have not been updated since 2010, before the emergence of additional MRI markers. We report an international collaborative study aiming to update and externally validate the Boston diagnostic criteria across the full spectrum of clinical CAA presentations.
In this multicentre, hospital-based, retrospective, MRI and neuropathology diagnostic accuracy study, we did a retrospective analysis of clinical, radiological, and histopathological data available to sites participating in the International CAA Association to formulate updated Boston criteria and establish their diagnostic accuracy across different populations and clinical presentations. Ten North American and European academic medical centres identified patients aged 50 years and older with potential CAA-related clinical presentations (ie, spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage, cognitive impairment, or transient focal neurological episodes), available brain MRI, and histopathological assessment for CAA diagnosis. MRI scans were centrally rated at Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston, MA, USA) for haemorrhagic and non-haemorrhagic CAA markers, and brain tissue samples were rated by neuropathologists at the contributing sites. We derived the Boston criteria version 2.0 (v2.0) by selecting MRI features to optimise diagnostic specificity and sensitivity in a prespecified derivation cohort (Boston cases 1994-2012, n=159), then externally validated the criteria in a prespecified temporal validation cohort (Boston cases 2012-18, n=59) and a geographical validation cohort (non-Boston cases 2004-18; n=123), comparing accuracy of the new criteria to the currently used modified Boston criteria with histopathological assessment of CAA as the diagnostic standard. We also assessed performance of the v2.0 criteria in patients across all cohorts who had the diagnostic gold standard of brain autopsy.
The study protocol was finalised on Jan 15, 2017, patient identification was completed on Dec 31, 2018, and imaging analyses were completed on Sept 30, 2019. Of 401 potentially eligible patients presenting to Massachusetts General Hospital, 218 were eligible to be included in the analysis; of 160 patient datasets from other centres, 123 were included. Using the derivation cohort, we derived provisional criteria for probable CAA requiring the presence of at least two strictly lobar haemorrhagic lesions (ie, intracerebral haemorrhages, cerebral microbleeds, or foci of cortical superficial siderosis) or at least one strictly lobar haemorrhagic lesion and at least one white matter characteristic (ie, severe visible perivascular spaces in centrum semiovale or white matter hyperintensities in a multispot pattern). The sensitivity and specificity of these criteria were 74·8% (95% CI 65·4-82·7) and 84·6% (71·9-93·1) in the derivation cohort, 92·5% (79·6-98·4) and 89·5% (66·9-98·7) in the temporal validation cohort, 80·2% (70·8-87·6) and 81·5% (61·9-93·7) in the geographical validation cohort, and 74·5% (65·4-82·4) and 95·0% (83·1-99·4) in all patients who had autopsy as the diagnostic standard. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0·797 (0·732-0·861) in the derivation cohort, 0·910 (0·828-0·992) in the temporal validation cohort, 0·808 (0·724-0·893) in the geographical validation cohort, and 0·848 (0·794-0·901) in patients who had autopsy as the diagnostic standard. The v2.0 Boston criteria for probable CAA had superior accuracy to the current Boston criteria (sensitivity 64·5% [54·9-73·4]; specificity 95·0% [83·1-99·4]; AUC 0·798 [0·741-0854]; p=0·0005 for comparison of AUC) across all individuals who had autopsy as the diagnostic standard.
The Boston criteria v2.0 incorporate emerging MRI markers of CAA to enhance sensitivity without compromising their specificity in our cohorts of patients aged 50 years and older presenting with spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage, cognitive impairment, or transient focal neurological episodes. Future studies will be needed to determine generalisability of the v.2.0 criteria across the full range of patients and clinical presentations.
US National Institutes of Health (R01 AG26484).
脑淀粉样血管病(CAA)是一种与年龄相关的小血管疾病,其病理学特征是淀粉样β在脑血管壁中进行性沉积。波士顿标准被全球用于 CAA 的体内诊断,但自 2010 年以来并未更新,当时尚未出现其他 MRI 标志物。我们报告了一项国际合作研究,旨在更新和外部验证波士顿诊断标准,以涵盖 CAA 所有临床表现。
在这项多中心、基于医院的回顾性 MRI 和神经病理学诊断准确性研究中,我们对参与国际 CAA 协会的各机构的现有临床、放射学和组织病理学数据进行了回顾性分析,以制定更新的波士顿标准,并确定不同人群和临床表现下的诊断准确性。十个北美和欧洲学术医疗中心确定了年龄在 50 岁及以上、有潜在 CAA 相关临床表现(即自发性颅内出血、认知障碍或短暂局灶性神经事件)、有脑 MRI 可用和 CAA 诊断组织病理学评估的患者。MRI 扫描在马萨诸塞州总医院(波士顿,MA,美国)进行评估,以确定出血性和非出血性 CAA 标志物,脑组织样本由参与机构的神经病理学家进行评估。我们通过选择 MRI 特征来优化诊断的特异性和敏感性,在一个预设的推导队列(波士顿病例 1994-2012,n=159)中得出了波士顿标准 2.0 版本(v2.0),然后在一个预设的时间验证队列(波士顿病例 2012-18,n=59)和一个地理验证队列(非波士顿病例 2004-18;n=123)中验证了这些标准的准确性,将新的标准与目前使用的有组织病理学评估的改良波士顿标准进行比较,以评估在所有具有脑尸检诊断金标准的患者中,新的 v2.0 标准的性能。
研究方案于 2017 年 1 月 15 日定稿,患者确定于 2018 年 12 月 31 日完成,影像学分析于 2019 年 9 月 30 日完成。在马萨诸塞州总医院,有 401 名可能符合条件的患者,其中 218 名符合纳入分析的条件;在其他中心的 160 名患者数据集中,有 123 名符合纳入条件。使用推导队列,我们得出了可能的 CAA 暂定标准,需要至少两个严格的脑叶出血性病变(即颅内出血、脑微出血或皮质表面铁沉积的焦点)或至少一个严格的脑叶出血性病变和至少一个白质特征(即大脑半卵圆中心中严重可见的血管周围间隙或多灶性模式的白质高信号)。这些标准的敏感性和特异性在推导队列中分别为 74.8%(95%CI 65.4-82.7)和 84.6%(71.9-93.1),在时间验证队列中分别为 92.5%(79.6-98.4)和 89.5%(66.9-98.7),在地理验证队列中分别为 80.2%(70.8-87.6)和 81.5%(61.9-93.7),在所有以尸检为诊断金标准的患者中分别为 74.5%(65.4-82.4)和 95.0%(83.1-99.4)。在推导队列中,接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)下的面积(AUC)为 0.797(0.732-0.861),在时间验证队列中为 0.910(0.828-0.992),在地理验证队列中为 0.808(0.724-0.893),在以尸检为诊断金标准的患者中为 0.848(0.794-0.901)。v2.0 波士顿 CAA 可能的标准在所有以尸检为诊断金标准的患者中,其准确性优于当前的波士顿标准(敏感性 64.5%[54.9-73.4];特异性 95.0%[83.1-99.4];AUC 0.798[0.741-0854];与 AUC 比较,p=0.0005)。
波士顿标准 v2.0 纳入了 CAA 的新兴 MRI 标志物,以提高敏感性,同时在我们年龄在 50 岁及以上、有自发性颅内出血、认知障碍或短暂局灶性神经事件等临床表现的患者队列中不影响其特异性。未来还需要进一步的研究来确定 v.2.0 标准在更广泛的患者人群和临床表现中的普遍性。
美国国立卫生研究院(R01 AG26484)。