Konrad Annika C, Förster Katharina, Kurtz Marcel, Endrass Tanja, Jauk Emanuel, Kanske Philipp
Clinical Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Addiction Research, Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 1;13:849650. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.849650. eCollection 2022.
Physical distancing measures during the coronavirus pandemic are associated with increased psychological distress, especially in people with mental disorders. We investigated which social risk and resilience factors influence distress over time in people with pre-existing mental disorders. We conducted a longitudinal online survey with weekly follow-ups between April and July 2020 ( = 196 individuals with, and = 545 individuals without pre-existing mental disorders at baseline). Our results show that individuals with, but not those without pre-existing mental disorders displayed higher distress levels when social resources and empathic disconnection are low and perceived social isolation is high. The distress development differed between participants with and without pre-existing mental disorders depending on their level of social resources, empathic disconnection, and perceived social isolation. These findings offer specific information for targeted social interventions to prevent an increase in incidence of mental disorders during physical distancing measures.
冠状病毒大流行期间的物理距离措施与心理困扰增加有关,尤其是在患有精神障碍的人群中。我们调查了哪些社会风险和复原力因素会随着时间的推移影响已有精神障碍患者的困扰程度。我们在2020年4月至7月期间进行了一项纵向在线调查,每周进行随访(基线时n = 196名患有精神障碍的个体,n = 545名没有精神障碍的个体)。我们的结果表明,当社会资源和共情脱节程度较低且感知到的社会隔离程度较高时,已有精神障碍的个体(而非没有精神障碍的个体)表现出更高的困扰水平。根据社会资源、共情脱节和感知到的社会隔离水平,已有精神障碍的参与者和没有精神障碍的参与者的困扰发展情况有所不同。这些发现为有针对性的社会干预提供了具体信息,以防止在物理距离措施期间精神障碍发病率的增加。