Department of Conservative & MI Dentistry, Unit of Distance Learning, King's College London Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, London, UK.
J Oral Rehabil. 2022 Oct;49(10):944-953. doi: 10.1111/joor.13358. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
Currently, there is a lack of data relating to dental practitioners' habits with clinical occlusal assessment and the application of practical techniques in occlusion.
The aim of this study was to investigate habits with clinical occlusal assessment and the practical application of established concepts in occlusion amongst a cohort of international dentists.
A piloted questionnaire with 20 statements was distributed by 5 recruiters. The recruiters were based in Malta (1), South Africa (1), Malaysia (1) and the UK (2). Outcomes were analysed using descriptives, chi-squared and Fisher's exact test. All the analyses were carried out in Stata, Version 12. Significance was inferred at p < .05.
Four hundred thirty-five completed responses were included in the sample (response rate, 70.7%). Overall, high levels of agreement were reported with the provision of single-unit crown and onlay restorations (78.8%) and bridge prostheses (up to 3 units, 77.9%), respectively. One-third (33.6%) agreed to observing dynamic occlusal relationships during an adult patient dental examination, 40.7% reported using articulators for crown and bridge cases, and 25.1% agreed to taking facebow records. Under half (47.3%) of the dentists expressed dissatisfaction with their undergraduate training in occlusion, with no significant association with the variables of the number of years of experience, the country of practice or being in general practice (p ≥ .226).
The results indicate a disparity between traditionally taught and applied concepts in clinical occlusion and the undertaking of occlusal assessments and the management of occlusion in clinical practice.
目前,关于牙科医生在临床咬合评估方面的习惯以及咬合实际应用技术的相关数据较为缺乏。
本研究旨在调查国际牙科医生群体在临床咬合评估方面的习惯以及咬合中既定概念的实际应用情况。
通过 5 名招聘人员分发了一份有 20 个陈述的试点问卷。招聘人员分别来自马耳他(1 人)、南非(1 人)、马来西亚(1 人)和英国(2 人)。使用描述性统计、卡方检验和 Fisher 确切检验对结果进行分析。所有分析均在 Stata 版本 12 中进行。推断显著性水平为 p<0.05。
共有 435 份完整回复被纳入样本(回复率为 70.7%)。总体而言,在提供单单位冠和嵌体修复以及桥体修复(最多 3 个单位)方面,报告了较高水平的一致性(分别为 78.8%和 77.9%)。三分之一(33.6%)的医生表示在成年患者的牙科检查期间会观察动态咬合关系,40.7%的医生报告在冠桥病例中使用了架,而 25.1%的医生同意记录面弓记录。不到一半(47.3%)的牙医对他们在咬合方面的本科培训不满意,但与经验年限、实践国家或是否从事一般实践等变量没有显著关联(p≥0.226)。
结果表明,在临床咬合以及咬合评估和临床实践中咬合管理方面,传统教学和应用概念之间存在差异。