Suppr超能文献

编辑精选 - 高危患者的血管内动脉瘤修复:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Editor's Choice - Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in High Risk Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Vascular Surgery Department, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.

Interventiona Radiology Unit, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.

出版信息

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2022 Nov;64(5):461-474. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.07.009. Epub 2022 Jul 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in high risk patients.

METHODS

Bibliographic sources (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and CENTRAL) were searched using combinations of thesaurus and free text terms. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021287207) and reported according to PRISMA 2020. Pooled estimates were calculated using odds ratio (OR) or hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) applying the Mantel-Haenszel or inverse variance method. EVAR peri-operative mortality in high risk patients over time was examined with mixed effects meta-regression. The GRADE framework was used to rate the certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

The pooled peri-operative mortality in 18 416 high risk patients who underwent EVAR was 3% (95% CI 2.3 - 4%) and has significantly reduced over time (year of publication p = .003; median study point p = .023). The peri-operative mortality was significantly lower in high risk patients treated with EVAR compared with open repair (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.45 - 0.92), but no significant difference was found in overall (HR 1.06; 95% CI 0.76 - 1.49) or aneurysm related mortality (HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.21 - 1.55). No significant difference was found in overall mortality between high risk patients treated with EVAR vs. no intervention (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.14 - 1.26), but the aneurysm related mortality was significantly lower in the former (HR 0.30; 95% CI 0.14 - 0.63). The peri-operative mortality was higher in high risk than normal risk patients treated with EVAR (OR 2.33; 95% CI 1.75 - 3.10), as was the overall mortality (HR 3.50; 95% CI 2.55 - 4.80). The certainty of evidence was very low for EVAR vs. open surgery or no intervention and low for high vs. normal risk patients.

CONCLUSION

The EVAR peri-operative mortality in high risk patients has improved over time. Even though the aneurysm related mortality of EVAR is lower compared with no intervention, EVAR may confer no overall survival benefit.

摘要

目的

探讨血管内动脉瘤修复术(EVAR)治疗高危患者的结果。

方法

通过主题词和自由文本词的组合,对书目来源(MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL 和 CENTRAL)进行了检索。审查方案在 PROSPERO(CRD42021287207)中进行了注册,并按照 PRISMA 2020 进行了报告。使用比值比(OR)或风险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI),应用 Mantel-Haenszel 或倒数方差法计算汇总估计值。通过混合效应荟萃回归检查高危患者 EVAR 围手术期死亡率随时间的变化。使用 GRADE 框架对证据的确定性进行评级。

结果

18416 例高危患者接受 EVAR 的围手术期死亡率为 3%(95%CI 2.3-4%),且随时间显著降低(出版年份的 p 值=0.003;中位数研究点的 p 值=0.023)。与开放修复相比,高危患者接受 EVAR 治疗的围手术期死亡率显著降低(OR 0.64;95%CI 0.45-0.92),但总体死亡率(HR 1.06;95%CI 0.76-1.49)或动脉瘤相关死亡率(HR 0.57;95%CI 0.21-1.55)无显著差异。高危患者接受 EVAR 治疗与未接受干预的患者相比,总体死亡率无显著差异(HR 0.42;95%CI 0.14-1.26),但前者的动脉瘤相关死亡率显著降低(HR 0.30;95%CI 0.14-0.63)。与高危患者接受 EVAR 治疗的正常风险患者相比,高危患者的围手术期死亡率(OR 2.33;95%CI 1.75-3.10)和总体死亡率(HR 3.50;95%CI 2.55-4.80)更高。EVAR 与开放手术或不干预相比,证据确定性为极低,高危与正常风险患者相比,证据确定性为低。

结论

高危患者 EVAR 的围手术期死亡率随时间有所改善。尽管 EVAR 的动脉瘤相关死亡率与不干预相比有所降低,但 EVAR 可能无法带来整体生存获益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验