Wei Boxuan, Duan Ran, Xie Feng, Gu Jieyu, Liu Caiyue, Gao Bowen
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200011, People's Republic of China.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Apr;47(2):622-630. doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-03017-z. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
Face-lift surgery is the most crucial and constantly evolving technique of facial rejuvenation. Periodic reviews synthesizing the latest face-lift techniques may help surgeons sharpen their surgical procedures.
A literature search was conducted of the PubMed databases using the search term "face lift" and "rhytidectomy." Articles reporting rhytidectomy of the forehead/brow, midface, lower face, and neck were included. Sixty-nine articles were selected after independent screening by three of the authors. The Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine scale was used for evaluating evidence level.
Of the 69 candidate articles, 10 studies (15%) reported techniques of neck lifting; 10 studies (15%) introduced techniques of endoscopic brow lifting; 7 studies (10%) pertained to brow lifting without endoscopic techniques. The most frequently reported locations of rhytidectomy were the brow/forehead (20%), neck (19%), and face-neck (17%). Additionally, articles regarding Asian face-lifts (14%) have been increasing. The evidence level of the articles was generally low, with only 10 articles assessed as level 1-3 with 59 articles as level 4-5.
Face-lift articles with high-level evidence are still lacking. Prominently, forehead lifting and neck lifting have become upward trends of rhytidectomy in recent years, and the techniques of short-scar face-lift have been more valued.
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
面部提升手术是面部年轻化最关键且不断发展的技术。定期综述最新的面部提升技术可能有助于外科医生优化其手术操作。
使用搜索词“面部提升”和“除皱术”对PubMed数据库进行文献检索。纳入报告前额/眉部、中面部、下面部和颈部除皱术的文章。由三位作者独立筛选后,选取了69篇文章。采用牛津循证医学中心量表评估证据水平。
在69篇候选文章中,10项研究(15%)报告了颈部提升技术;10项研究(15%)介绍了内镜下眉提升技术;7项研究(10%)涉及非内镜技术的眉提升。除皱术最常报告的部位是眉/前额(20%)、颈部(19%)和面部-颈部(17%)。此外,关于亚洲人面部提升的文章(14%)一直在增加。文章的证据水平普遍较低,只有10篇文章被评估为1-3级,59篇文章为4-5级。
仍缺乏具有高级别证据的面部提升文章。值得注意的是,近年来前额提升和颈部提升已成为除皱术的上升趋势,短瘢痕面部提升技术更受重视。
证据水平III:本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据水平。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或作者在线指南www.springer.com/00266 。