Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, 1# Youyi Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400016, People's Republic of China.
Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 277 West Yanta Road, Xi'an, 710061, People's Republic of China.
BMC Surg. 2022 Jul 26;22(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01730-9.
Cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) leak remains an important issue in endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES). A standard protocol for skull base closure has not yet been established, and the application of rigid buttress has not been given sufficient attention. To emphasize the functions of support and fixation from rigid buttress in reconstruction, we introduced the cruciate embedding fascia-bone flap (CEFB) technique using autologous bone graft to buttress the fascia lata attachment to the partially sutured skull base dural defect and evaluated its efficacy in a consecutive case series of grade II-III CSF leaks in EES.
Data from consecutive patients diagnosed with sellar region lesions with grade II-III CSF leaks during EES were collected from May 2015 to May 2020. Skull base reconstructions were performed with the CEFB or the conventional pedicle vascularized nasoseptal flap (PNSF). Related clinical data were analysed. The combined use of the CEFB and PNSF was applied to an additional supplemental case series of patients with grade III leak and multiple high-risk factors.
There were 110 and 65 patients included in the CEFB and PNSF groups, respectively. The CEFB demonstrated similar effects on the incidence of postoperative CSF leak (2.7%), intracranial infection (4.5%), and lumbar drainage (LD) placement (5.5%) as PNSF (3.1%, 3.1%, and 6.2%), but with less epistaxis (CEFB: 0%, PNSF: 6.2%) and nasal discomforts (CEFB: 0%, PNSF: 7.7%). The LD duration (CEFB: 6.67 ± 2.16 days, PNSF: 10.50 ± 2.38 days), bed-stay time (CEFB: 5.74 ± 1.58 days, PNSF: 8.83 ± 3.78 days) and hospitalization time (CEFB: 10.49 ± 5.51 days, PNSF: 13.58 ± 5.50 days) were shortened in the CEFB group. The combined use of CEFB and PNSF resulted in 0 postoperative CSF leaks in the supplemental case series of 23 highly susceptible patients.
This study suggested that the new CEFB technique has the potential to prevent postoperative CSF leak in EES. The results indicated that it can be used effectively without PNSF in suitable cases or applied in addition to a PNSF with high compatibility when necessary. Its effectiveness should be further verified with a larger cohort and better design in the next step. Trial Registration Current Controlled Trials ChiCTR2100044764 (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry); date of registration: 27 March 2020. Retrospectively registered.
在鼻内镜颅底手术(EES)中,脑脊液(CSF)漏仍然是一个重要问题。尚未建立标准的颅底闭合方案,刚性支撑物的应用也没有得到足够的重视。为了强调刚性支撑物在重建中的支撑和固定功能,我们引入了使用自体骨移植物支撑阔筋膜附着于部分缝合的颅底硬脑膜缺损的十字嵌入筋膜-骨瓣(CEFB)技术,并在 EES 中连续的 II-III 级 CSF 漏患者的病例系列中评估了其疗效。
从 2015 年 5 月至 2020 年 5 月,我们收集了在 EES 中诊断为鞍区病变并伴有 II-III 级 CSF 漏的连续患者的数据。使用 CEFB 或常规带蒂鼻中隔-鼻甲骨瓣(PNSF)进行颅底重建。分析相关临床资料。将 CEFB 和 PNSF 的联合应用于另外一组 III 级漏和多个高危因素的患者的补充病例系列中。
CEFB 组和 PNSF 组分别有 110 例和 65 例患者。CEFB 在术后 CSF 漏(2.7%,PNSF:3.1%)、颅内感染(4.5%,PNSF:3.1%)和腰椎引流(LD)放置(5.5%,PNSF:6.2%)的发生率方面与 PNSF 相似,但鼻出血(CEFB:0%,PNSF:6.2%)和鼻部不适(CEFB:0%,PNSF:7.7%)发生率较低。LD 持续时间(CEFB:6.67±2.16 天,PNSF:10.50±2.38 天)、卧床时间(CEFB:5.74±1.58 天,PNSF:8.83±3.78 天)和住院时间(CEFB:10.49±5.51 天,PNSF:13.58±5.50 天)在 CEFB 组均缩短。在 23 例高易感患者的补充病例系列中,CEFB 和 PNSF 的联合使用导致术后无 CSF 漏。
本研究表明,新型 CEFB 技术有可能预防 EES 术后 CSF 漏。结果表明,在合适的情况下,它可以单独使用,而无需 PNSF,或者在必要时与 PNSF 联合使用,具有很好的兼容性。下一步需要更大的队列和更好的设计来进一步验证其有效性。
中国临床试验注册中心 ChiCTR2100044764(注册号);注册日期:2020 年 3 月 27 日。前瞻性注册。