Suppr超能文献

用于快速检测非洲猪瘟病毒的免DNA提取定量聚合酶链反应、可视化环介导等温扩增法和荧光环介导等温扩增法的临床验证

Clinical Validation of DNA Extraction-Free qPCR, Visual LAMP, and Fluorescent LAMP Assays for the Rapid Detection of African Swine Fever Virus.

作者信息

Yang Lili, Wang Lin, Lv Meihui, Sun Yu, Cao Jijuan

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Biotechnology and Bioresources Utilization of Ministry of Education, Dalian Minzu University, Dalian 116600, China.

Beijing Animal Disease Prevention and Control Center, Beijing 102629, China.

出版信息

Life (Basel). 2022 Jul 16;12(7):1067. doi: 10.3390/life12071067.

Abstract

The global pig industry and food safety are seriously threatened by outbreaks of African swine fever (ASF). To permit early diagnosis of African swine fever virus (ASFV), prevent its spread, and limit its outbreaks, a highly sensitive diagnostic method that can be performed at pig farms is required. Herein, we established DNA extraction-free real-time PCR (qPCR), visual loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), and fluorescent LAMP assays, which were compared with the results of World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) qPCR to assess ASFV-infected clinical samples. Based on plasmid DNA, the limit of detection for the three assays and OIE qPCR were 5.8 copies/μL. All four assays had good ASFV specificity and showed no cross-reactivity with other tested viruses. These assays were used to diagnose 100 clinical samples. The assays showed good diagnostic consistency, with kappa values of 1.0, 0.84, and 0.88, respectively. Compared with OIE qPCR, the diagnostic specificity/sensitivity of DNA extraction-free qPCR, visual LAMP, and fluorescent LAMP assays were 100%/100%, 100%/87.1%, and 100%/90.32%, respectively. The assays eliminated the need for DNA extraction and are more suitable for ASF diagnosis by inexperienced farmers in low-resource environments, making them a good choice for on-site monitoring of pig farms.

摘要

非洲猪瘟(ASF)疫情严重威胁着全球养猪业和食品安全。为了实现非洲猪瘟病毒(ASFV)的早期诊断、预防其传播并控制疫情爆发,需要一种能在猪场进行的高灵敏度诊断方法。在此,我们建立了无需DNA提取的实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)、可视化环介导等温扩增(LAMP)和荧光LAMP检测方法,并将其与世界动物卫生组织(OIE)qPCR的结果进行比较,以评估ASFV感染的临床样本。基于质粒DNA,这三种检测方法和OIE qPCR的检测限均为5.8拷贝/微升。这四种检测方法对ASFV均具有良好的特异性,与其他受试病毒均无交叉反应。这些检测方法用于诊断100份临床样本。结果显示,这些检测方法具有良好的诊断一致性,kappa值分别为1.0、0.84和0.88。与OIE qPCR相比,无需DNA提取的qPCR、可视化LAMP和荧光LAMP检测方法的诊断特异性/敏感性分别为100%/100%、100%/87.1%和100%/90.32%。这些检测方法无需进行DNA提取,更适合资源匮乏地区缺乏经验的养殖户进行ASF诊断,是猪场现场监测的理想选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cb8/9320077/adc94e9ef5d2/life-12-01067-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验