Fang Yuli, Ma Yuanyuan, He Haiyan, Chen Ting, Fu Jingjing, Zhu Jingci
Department of Basic Nursing, School of Nursing, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Department of Nephrology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Liaoning, China.
Int J Nurs Sci. 2022 Jun 16;9(3):278-285. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2022.06.014. eCollection 2022 Jul.
This study aimed to investigate the application status of preventive measures for feeding intolerance in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (STBI) in China and analysis the differences and their causes.
A cross-sectional survey was conducted. From December 2019 to January 2020, ICU nurses and physicians of 89 hospitals in China were surveyed by using a questionnaire on preventive strategies for feeding intolerance in patients with STBI. The questionnaire included two parts: the general information of participants (10 items) and application of preventive measures for feeding intolerance in STBI patients (18 items).
Totally 996 nurses and physicians completed the questionnaire. Among various methods, gastrointestinal symptoms(85.0%) and injury severity (71.4%) were mostly used to assess gastrointestinal functions and risk of feeding intolerance among STBI patients, respectively. Initiating enteral nutrition (EN) within 24-48 h (61.5%), nasogastric tubes (91.2%), 30°-45° of head-of-bed elevation (89.5%), continuous feeding by pump (72.9%), EN solution temperature of 38-40 °C (65.5%), <500 ml initial volume of EN solution (50.0%), monitoring gastric residual volume with a syringe (93.7%), and assessing gastric residual volume every 4 h (51.5%) were mostly applied for EN delivery among STBI patients. Prokinetic agents (73.3%), enema (73.6%), probiotics (79.0%), antacid agents (84.1%), and non-nutritional preparations as initial EN formula (65.6%) were commonly used for preventing feeding intolerance among STBI patients.
The survey showed that nurses and clinicians in China have a positive attitude towards preventive strategies for feeding intolerance. However, some effective new technologies and methods have not been timely applied in clinical practice. We suggest that managers, researchers, clinicians, nurses, and other health professionals should collaborate to explore effective and standard preventive strategies for feeding intolerance among patients with STBI.
本研究旨在调查中国重型颅脑损伤(STBI)患者喂养不耐受预防措施的应用现状,并分析差异及其原因。
进行横断面调查。2019年12月至2020年1月,采用关于STBI患者喂养不耐受预防策略的问卷对中国89家医院的ICU护士和医生进行调查。问卷包括两部分:参与者的一般信息(10项)和STBI患者喂养不耐受预防措施的应用(18项)。
共有996名护士和医生完成问卷。在各种方法中,胃肠道症状(85.0%)和损伤严重程度(71.4%)分别最常用于评估STBI患者的胃肠功能和喂养不耐受风险。在24 - 48小时内开始肠内营养(EN)(61.5%)、鼻胃管(91.2%)、床头抬高30° - 45°(89.5%)、泵持续喂养(72.9%)、EN溶液温度38 - 40°C(65.5%)、EN溶液初始量<500 ml(50.0%)、用注射器监测胃残余量(93.7%)以及每4小时评估胃残余量(51.5%)是STBI患者EN输注最常采用的方法。促动力剂(73.3%)、灌肠(73.6%)、益生菌(79.0%)、抗酸剂(84.1%)以及非营养制剂作为初始EN配方(65.6%)常用于预防STBI患者的喂养不耐受。
调查显示中国护士和临床医生对喂养不耐受预防策略持积极态度。然而,一些有效的新技术和方法尚未在临床实践中及时应用。我们建议管理人员、研究人员、临床医生、护士和其他卫生专业人员应合作探索针对STBI患者喂养不耐受的有效和标准化预防策略。