Section of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Department of Pathology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri.
Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Sep 1;28(17):3720-3728. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-0862.
The incidence of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is higher among Black or African American (AA) women, yet they are underrepresented in clinical trials. To evaluate safety and efficacy of durvalumab concurrent with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage I-III TNBC by race, we enrolled additional AA patients to a Phase I/II clinical trial.
Our study population included 67 patients. The primary efficacy endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR; ypT0/is, N0) rate. χ2 tests were used to evaluate associations between race and baseline characteristics. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess association between race and overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate associations between race and pCR, immune-related adverse events (irAE) and recurrence.
Twenty-one patients (31%) self-identified as AA. No significant associations between race and baseline tumor stage (P = 0.40), PD-L1 status (0.92), and stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (sTIL) count (P = 0.57) were observed. pCR rates were similar between AA (43%) and non-AA patients (48%; P = 0.71). Three-year EFS rates were 78.3% and 71.4% in non-AA and AA patients, respectively [HR, 1.451; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.524-4.017; P = 0.474]; 3-year OS was 87% and 81%, respectively (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 0.481-6.136; P = 0.405). The incidence of irAEs was similar between AA and non-AA patients and no significant associations were found between irAEs and pathologic response.
pCR rates, 3-year OS and EFS after neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy were similar in AA and non-AA patients. Toxicities, including the frequency of irAEs, were also similar.
三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)在黑种人或非裔美国人(AA)女性中的发病率较高,但她们在临床试验中的代表性不足。为了评估 durvalumab 联合新辅助化疗治疗 I-III 期 TNBC 的安全性和有效性,我们招募了更多的 AA 患者参与一项 I/II 期临床试验。
我们的研究人群包括 67 名患者。主要疗效终点是病理完全缓解(ypT0/is,N0)率。χ2 检验用于评估种族与基线特征之间的关联。Cox 比例风险模型用于评估种族与总生存(OS)和无事件生存(EFS)之间的关联。多变量逻辑回归分析用于评估种族与 pCR、免疫相关不良事件(irAE)和复发之间的关联。
21 名患者(31%)自我认定为 AA。种族与基线肿瘤分期(P = 0.40)、PD-L1 状态(P = 0.92)和间质肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(sTIL)计数(P = 0.57)之间无显著关联。AA 患者(43%)和非 AA 患者(48%)的 pCR 率相似(P = 0.71)。非 AA 患者和 AA 患者的 3 年 EFS 率分别为 78.3%和 71.4%[HR,1.451;95%置信区间(CI),0.524-4.017;P = 0.474];3 年 OS 率分别为 87%和 81%(HR,1.72;95% CI,0.481-6.136;P = 0.405)。AA 患者和非 AA 患者的 irAE 发生率相似,irAE 与病理反应之间无显著关联。
新辅助免疫化疗后,AA 患者和非 AA 患者的 pCR 率、3 年 OS 和 EFS 相似。毒性作用,包括 irAE 的频率,也相似。