Jiang Liling, Chen Jiao, Huang Haiping, Wu Jian, Zhang Junbin, Lan Xiaosong, Liu Daihong, Zhang Jiuquan
Department of Radiology, Cancer Hospital, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Department of Pathology, Cancer Hospital, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 22;12:895972. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.895972. eCollection 2022.
This study aimed to compare the diagnostic capacity between IVIM and DKI in differentiating malignant from benign thyroid nodules.
This study is based on magnetic resonance imaging data of the thyroid with histopathology as the reference standard. Spearman analysis was used to assess the relationship of IVIM-derived parameters D, f, D* and the DKI-derived parameters D and K. The parameters of IVIM and DKI were compared between the malignant and benign groups. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to establish the diagnostic model, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was subsequently performed. The DeLong test was used to compare the diagnostic effectiveness of different prediction models. Spearman analysis was used to assess the relationship of Ki-67 expression and parameters of IVIM and DKI.
Among the 93 nodules, 46 nodules were malignant, and 47 nodules were benign. The D of DKI-derived parameter was related to the D (P < 0.001, r = 0.863) of IVIM-derived parameter. The K of DKI-derived parameter was related to the D (P < 0.001, r = -0.831) of IVIM-derived parameters. The malignant group had a significantly lower D value (P < 0.001) and f value (P = 0.013) than the benign group. The malignant group had significantly higher K and lower D values (all P < 0.001). The D+f had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.951. The D+K had an AUC of 0.943. The D+f+D+K had an AUC of 0.954. The DeLong test showed no statistical significance among there prediction models. The D (P = 0.007) of IVIM-derived parameters and D (P = 0.045) of DKI-derived parameter were correlated to the Ki-67 expression.
IVIM and DKI were alternative for each other in in differentiating malignant from benign thyroid nodules.
本研究旨在比较体素内不相干运动(IVIM)和扩散峰度成像(DKI)在鉴别甲状腺良恶性结节方面的诊断能力。
本研究基于甲状腺磁共振成像数据,并以组织病理学为参考标准。采用Spearman分析评估IVIM衍生参数D、f、D*与DKI衍生参数D和K之间的关系。比较良恶性组之间IVIM和DKI的参数。进行二元逻辑回归分析以建立诊断模型,随后进行受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析。使用DeLong检验比较不同预测模型的诊断效能。采用Spearman分析评估Ki-67表达与IVIM和DKI参数之间的关系。
93个结节中,46个为恶性,47个为良性。DKI衍生参数的D与IVIM衍生参数的D相关(P<0.001,r=0.863)。DKI衍生参数的K与IVIM衍生参数的D相关(P<0.001,r=-0.831)。恶性组的D值(P<0.001)和f值(P=0.013)显著低于良性组。恶性组的K值显著更高而D值更低(均P<0.001)。D+f的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.951。D+K的AUC为0.943。D+f+D+K的AUC为0.954。DeLong检验显示这三种预测模型之间无统计学意义。IVIM衍生参数的D(P=0.007)和DKI衍生参数的D(P=0.045)与Ki-67表达相关。
在鉴别甲状腺良恶性结节方面,IVIM和DKI可相互替代。