Jafarnia Shiva, Zeinaddini Meymand Javad, Zandkarimi Fateme, Saberi Sogol, Shahabi Sima, Valanezhad Alireza, Safaee Sirus, Nesabi Mahdis, Watanabe Ikuya
Department of Dental and Biomedical Materials Science, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Japan.
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
Front Dent. 2022 Feb 6;19:8. doi: 10.18502/fid.v19i8.8725. eCollection 2022.
The aim of this study was to assess the microtensile bond strength of three universal adhesives to dentin and enamel. Sixty extracted human third molar teeth were chosen and divided into six groups regarding the adhesive (G-Premio Bond, Clearfil S3 Bond or Single Bond) and tooth surface. All the applied bonding agents were universal adhesives. The teeth were polished and the adhesives were applied; then the teeth were restored with composite resin. The samples were mounted in acrylic resin and sectioned. The specimens were subjected to a universal testing machine and the microtensile bond strength was measured. The failure mode of each specimen was determined under a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA (α=0.05). The microtensile bond strength of G-Premio Bond to enamel and dentin was 11.79±8.27 and 17.55±9.47 MPa, respectively which was not significantly different from the values in Single Bond group (15.59±10.66 and 17.19±10.09 MPa to enamel and dentin, respectively; P>0.05). However, the values for Clearfil S3 Bond were 7.11±4.23 and 7.88±8.83 MPa to enamel and dentin, respectively, which were significantly lower than the values for G-Premio Bond (P<0.05). Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) images showed that the adhesive failure was dominant in both enamel and dentin groups and in all adhesive systems. G-Premio Bond and Single Bond provided higher microtensile bond strength compared with Clearfil S3 Bond. Universal adhesives with their acceptable performance can be applied in self-etch mode on both enamel and dentin.
本研究的目的是评估三种通用型粘结剂与牙本质和牙釉质的微拉伸粘结强度。选取60颗拔除的人类第三磨牙,根据粘结剂(G-Premio Bond、Clearfil S3 Bond或Single Bond)和牙齿表面分为六组。所有使用的粘结剂均为通用型粘结剂。对牙齿进行打磨并涂抹粘结剂;然后用复合树脂进行修复。将样本固定在丙烯酸树脂中并切片。将标本置于万能试验机上,测量微拉伸粘结强度。在体视显微镜下确定每个标本的失效模式。使用双向方差分析(α=0.05)对数据进行分析。G-Premio Bond与牙釉质和牙本质的微拉伸粘结强度分别为11.79±8.27和17.55±9.47 MPa,与Single Bond组的值(牙釉质和牙本质分别为15.59±10.66和17.19±10.09 MPa;P>0.05)无显著差异。然而,Clearfil S3 Bond与牙釉质和牙本质的粘结强度值分别为7.11±4.23和7.88±8.83 MPa,显著低于G-Premio Bond的值(P<0.05)。扫描电子显微镜(SEM)图像显示,在牙釉质和牙本质组以及所有粘结剂系统中,粘结剂失效均占主导。与Clearfil S3 Bond相比,G-Premio Bond和Single Bond具有更高的微拉伸粘结强度。性能良好的通用型粘结剂可在自酸蚀模式下应用于牙釉质和牙本质。