Marletta Stefano, Pantanowitz Liron, Malvi Deborah, Novelli Luca, Mescoli Claudia, Cardillo Massimo, D'Errico Antonietta, Girolami Ilaria, Eccher Albino
Department of Pathology and Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Department of Pathology & Clinical Labs, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Acad Pathol. 2022 Jul 31;9(1):100047. doi: 10.1016/j.acpath.2022.100047. eCollection 2022.
Despite increased use of digital pathology, its application in the transplantation setting remains limited. One of the restraints is related to concerns that this technology is inadequate for supporting diagnostic work. In this study, we sought to establish non inferiority of whole slide imaging (WSI) to light microscopy (LM) for intraoperative transplantation diagnosis using inexpensive portable devices. A validation study was conducted according to updated guidelines from the College of American Pathologists (CAP) utilizing 80 intraoperative transplantation cases. Two pathologists reviewed glass slides with LM and digital slides on two different tablets after a washout period of 4 weeks. Diagnostic concordance and intra-observer agreement were recorded. A total of 45 (56%) cases were suitable for rendering transplant diagnoses and 35 (44%) for assessing cancer risk. Intra-observer agreement was 95.1% for organ suitability and 100% for cancer risk. There were no major discordances that could affect patient transplant management. Digital evaluation of intraoperative transplant specimens using tablets to view whole slide images was non-inferior to LM for primary diagnosis. This suggests that after validating WSI these digital tools can be safely used for remote intraoperative transplantation diagnostic work.
尽管数字病理学的使用有所增加,但其在移植领域的应用仍然有限。限制因素之一是担心这项技术不足以支持诊断工作。在本研究中,我们试图使用廉价的便携式设备确定全切片成像(WSI)在术中移植诊断方面不劣于光学显微镜(LM)。根据美国病理学家学会(CAP)的最新指南进行了一项验证研究,纳入80例术中移植病例。在4周的洗脱期后,两名病理学家在两台不同的平板电脑上分别用LM查看玻璃切片和用WSI查看数字切片。记录诊断一致性和观察者内一致性。共有45例(56%)病例适合做出移植诊断,35例(44%)适合评估癌症风险。观察者内一致性在器官适合性方面为95.1%,在癌症风险方面为100%。没有可能影响患者移植管理的重大不一致情况。使用平板电脑查看全切片图像对术中移植标本进行数字评估在初步诊断方面不劣于LM。这表明在验证WSI后,这些数字工具可安全用于远程术中移植诊断工作。