Mistur Evan M, Givens John Wagner, Matisoff Daniel C
Department of Public Affairs University of Texas at Arlington Arlington Texas USA.
Department of International Studies Spelman College Atlanta Georgia USA.
Rev Policy Res. 2022 May 26. doi: 10.1111/ropr.12487.
The COVID-19 crisis demanded rapid, widespread policy action. In response, nations turned to different forms of social distancing policies to reduce the spread of the virus. These policies were implemented globally, proving as contagious as the virus they are meant to prevent. Yet, variation in their implementation invites questions as to how and why countries adopt social distancing policies, and whether the causal mechanisms driving these policy adoptions are based on internal resources and problem conditions or other external factors such as conditions in other countries. We leverage daily changes in international social distancing policies to understand the impacts of problem characteristics, institutional and economic context, and peer effects on social distancing policy adoption. Using fixed-effects models on an international panel of daily data from 2020, we find that peer effects, particularly mimicry of geographic neighbors, political peers, and language agnates drive policy diffusion and shape countries' policy choices.
新冠疫情危机需要迅速、广泛的政策行动。作为回应,各国采取了不同形式的社交距离政策以减少病毒传播。这些政策在全球范围内实施,其传播性与它们旨在预防的病毒一样强。然而,政策实施的差异引发了关于各国如何以及为何采用社交距离政策的问题,以及推动这些政策采用的因果机制是基于国内资源和问题状况还是其他外部因素,如其他国家的状况。我们利用国际社交距离政策的每日变化来了解问题特征、制度和经济背景以及同伴效应对社交距离政策采用的影响。通过对2020年每日数据的国际面板使用固定效应模型,我们发现同伴效应,特别是对地理邻国、政治同伴和语言同源国家的模仿推动了政策扩散并塑造了各国的政策选择。