Suppr超能文献

东南新英格兰地区日托中心和家庭儿童看护所中婴幼儿的喂养和活动环境。

Feeding and Activity Environments for Infants and Toddlers in Childcare Centers and Family Childcare Homes in Southeastern New England.

机构信息

Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI 02912, USA.

Center for Health Promotion and Health Equity, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI 02912, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 6;19(15):9702. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159702.

Abstract

Few studies have documented the food and physical activity (PA) environments of childcare settings caring for children <24 months of age, although they may be key contributors to developing child PA and diet patterns. We used an adapted Environment and Policy Assessment and Observation tool to assess the food and activity environments for infants and toddlers in childcare centers (n = 21) and family childcare homes (FCCH) (n = 20) and explored differences by childcare type. Many similarities were found between childcare site types; however, centers used more recommended feeding practices than FCCH (e.g., 100% of center providers talked with toddlers about feelings of hunger or fullness compared to 18% of family childcare providers (FCCP), p < 0.01). Differences in non-recommended feeding practices (e.g., spoon feeding, bottle propping and encouraging unhealthy foods) were mixed between childcare types. Toddlers in centers spent more time playing at higher PA levels than those in FCCH (61 vs. 13 min, p < 0.001). Screen time was observed in FCCH, but not in centers. Differences between childcare types may indicate differential influences on infant and toddler feeding and PA behaviors, which could predict disparate obesity risk. Future research should further observe these behaviors in a larger sample of centers and FCCH to inform childcare interventions and policies.

摘要

很少有研究记录了照顾 <24 个月大的儿童的儿童保育环境中的食物和身体活动(PA)环境,尽管它们可能是培养儿童 PA 和饮食模式的关键因素。我们使用了经过改编的环境和政策评估及观察工具,评估了儿童保育中心(n=21)和家庭儿童保育家庭(FCCH)(n=20)中婴儿和幼儿的食物和活动环境,并探讨了不同类型儿童保育机构之间的差异。虽然在不同类型的儿童保育场所之间存在许多相似之处,但中心采用的喂养实践比 FCCH 更推荐(例如,100%的中心提供者与幼儿讨论饥饿或饱腹感,而家庭儿童保育提供者为 18%(FCCP),p<0.01)。在不推荐的喂养实践(例如,用勺子喂食、支撑奶瓶和鼓励吃不健康的食物)方面,不同类型的儿童保育机构之间存在差异。中心的幼儿比 FCCH 的幼儿花费更多的时间在更高水平的 PA 上(61 与 13 分钟,p<0.001)。FCCH 观察到了屏幕时间,但中心没有。儿童保育类型之间的差异可能表明对婴儿和幼儿喂养和 PA 行为的不同影响,这可能会预测肥胖风险的差异。未来的研究应该在更大的中心和 FCCH 样本中进一步观察这些行为,为儿童保育干预措施和政策提供信息。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

5
Association between parent and child physical activity: a systematic review.亲子身体活动的关联:系统评价。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 May 18;17(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00966-z.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验