Goel Kanishk, Ploski Jonathan E
School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, United States.
Department of Neural and Behavioral Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States.
Front Mol Neurosci. 2022 Jul 26;15:914430. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2022.914430. eCollection 2022.
Manipulating gene expression within and outside the nervous system is useful for interrogating gene function and developing therapeutic interventions for a variety of diseases. Several approaches exist which enable gene manipulation in preclinical models, and some of these have been approved to treat human diseases. For the last couple of decades, RNA interference (RNAi) has been a leading technique to knockdown (i.e., suppress) specific RNA expression. This has been partly due to the technology's simplicity, which has promoted its adoption throughout biomedical science. However, accumulating evidence indicates that this technology can possess significant shortcomings. This review highlights the overwhelming evidence that RNAi can be prone to off-target effects and is capable of inducing cytotoxicity in some cases. With this in mind, we consider alternative CRISPR/Cas-based approaches, which may be safer and more reliable for gene knockdown. We also discuss the pros and cons of each approach.
在神经系统内外操纵基因表达,对于探究基因功能以及开发针对多种疾病的治疗干预措施很有用。目前存在几种可在临床前模型中进行基因操纵的方法,其中一些已被批准用于治疗人类疾病。在过去几十年里,RNA干扰(RNAi)一直是敲低(即抑制)特定RNA表达的主要技术。部分原因在于该技术操作简便,这促使其在整个生物医学领域得到应用。然而,越来越多的证据表明,这项技术可能存在重大缺陷。本综述着重介绍了大量证据,表明RNAi可能易于产生脱靶效应,并且在某些情况下能够诱导细胞毒性。考虑到这一点,我们探讨了基于CRISPR/Cas的替代方法,这些方法在基因敲低方面可能更安全、更可靠。我们还讨论了每种方法的优缺点。