• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

切口按压,一种减少结直肠手术部位感染的简单有效干预措施:一项倾向评分匹配研究。

Incision pressing, a simple and effective intervention to reduce colorectal surgical site infection: A propensity score-matched study.

作者信息

Jiang Yugang, Chen Hongyuan, Liu Guotao, Liu Meifeng, Kong Meng, Sheng Hongguang

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2022 Jul 26;9:917559. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.917559. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2022.917559
PMID:35959115
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9360615/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colorectal surgery is associated with a high risk of surgical site infection (SSI). In March 2017, we developed an intervention, called "PRESS", with the aim of reducing colorectal superficial SSI. This study assessed the effect of the new intervention in reducing the rates of superficial SSI in colorectal surgery.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective review of 312 PRESS+ patients compared to 171 historical control PRESS- patients who were 18 years of age or older and underwent elective colorectal surgery with clean-contaminated wounds from January 2015 to June 2020. In the PRESS+ groups, we pressed the incision downward hard with clean gauze after the interrupted suturing of the skin. Propensity score matching with 15 variables was performed in a 1:1 ratio to reduce selection bias. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis were performed to identify risk factors associated with SSI.

RESULTS

The characteristics of the PRESS+ ( = 160) and PRESS- ( = 160) groups were well balanced after propensity score matching. The PRESS+ group had a lower superficial SSI rate (1.9% vs. 6.9%,  = 0.029) and a lower overall SSI rate (2.5% vs. 10.0%,  = 0.006) than the PRESS- group. Furthermore, multivariate analysis showed that the incisional press was an effective protective factor for superficial SSI (adjusted odds ratio = 0.215, 95% confidence interval = 0.057-0.818,  = 0.024). In addition, female sex ( = 0.048) and blood transfusion ( = 0.011) were demonstrated to be independent risk factors for superficial SSI.

CONCLUSION

The incisional press after suturing is a simple, costless, and effective intervention in reducing superficial incisional SSI.

摘要

背景

结直肠手术与手术部位感染(SSI)的高风险相关。2017年3月,我们开发了一种名为“PRESS”的干预措施,旨在降低结直肠浅表SSI。本研究评估了这种新干预措施在降低结直肠手术浅表SSI发生率方面的效果。

方法

本研究对312例接受PRESS干预的患者与171例历史对照的未接受PRESS干预的患者进行回顾性分析,这些患者年龄在18岁及以上,于2015年1月至2020年6月期间接受了清洁-污染伤口的择期结直肠手术。在接受PRESS干预的组中,皮肤间断缝合后,我们用干净纱布用力向下按压切口。进行1:1比例的15个变量的倾向得分匹配以减少选择偏倚。进行单因素分析和多因素分析以确定与SSI相关的危险因素。

结果

倾向得分匹配后,接受PRESS干预组(n = 160)和未接受PRESS干预组(n = 160)的特征得到了很好的平衡。接受PRESS干预组的浅表SSI发生率较低(1.9%对6.9%,P = 0.029),总体SSI发生率也较低(2.5%对10.0%,P = 0.006)。此外,多因素分析表明,切口按压是浅表SSI的有效保护因素(调整后的优势比 = 0.215,95%置信区间 = 0.057 - 0.818,P = 0.024)。此外,女性(P = 0.048)和输血(P = 0.011)被证明是浅表SSI的独立危险因素。

结论

缝合后切口按压是一种简单、无成本且有效的降低浅表切口SSI的干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b7b/9360615/db308f60d622/fsurg-09-917559-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b7b/9360615/bdd8259d9ee7/fsurg-09-917559-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b7b/9360615/e512dde02421/fsurg-09-917559-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b7b/9360615/3ded65dec639/fsurg-09-917559-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b7b/9360615/db308f60d622/fsurg-09-917559-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b7b/9360615/bdd8259d9ee7/fsurg-09-917559-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b7b/9360615/e512dde02421/fsurg-09-917559-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b7b/9360615/3ded65dec639/fsurg-09-917559-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b7b/9360615/db308f60d622/fsurg-09-917559-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Incision pressing, a simple and effective intervention to reduce colorectal surgical site infection: A propensity score-matched study.切口按压,一种减少结直肠手术部位感染的简单有效干预措施:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Front Surg. 2022 Jul 26;9:917559. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.917559. eCollection 2022.
2
The Efficacy of Chemical Bowel Preparation Against Incisional Surgical Site Infection in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Propensity Score Matching Study.化学肠道准备预防结直肠癌手术切口部位感染的疗效:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Anticancer Res. 2024 Aug;44(8):3473-3480. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.17167.
3
Risk factors for surgical site infection in emergency colorectal surgery: a retrospective analysis.急诊结直肠手术手术部位感染的危险因素:一项回顾性分析
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014 Jun;15(3):256-61. doi: 10.1089/sur.2012.154. Epub 2014 May 8.
4
High Compliance With Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Prevention Bundle Reduces Incisional SSI After Colorectal Surgery.高度依从手术部位感染(SSI)预防综合措施可降低结直肠手术后的切口SSI发生率。
Ann Coloproctol. 2021 Jun;37(3):146-152. doi: 10.3393/ac.2020.04.10.2. Epub 2020 May 15.
5
Surgical site infection following surgery for inflammatory bowel disease in patients with clean-contaminated wounds.清洁-污染伤口的炎症性肠病患者手术后手术部位感染
World J Surg. 2009 May;33(5):1042-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-9934-4.
6
The preventive surgical site infection bundle in patients with colorectal perforation.结直肠穿孔患者的预防性手术部位感染综合措施
BMC Surg. 2015 Dec 18;15:128. doi: 10.1186/s12893-015-0115-0.
7
Risk factors for incisional surgical site infection after elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery.择期腹腔镜结直肠手术后切口手术部位感染的危险因素。
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2019 Jan 11;3(2):202-208. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12229. eCollection 2019 Mar.
8
Surgical site infection prevention bundle in elective colorectal surgery.择期结直肠手术中的手术部位感染预防综合措施
J Hosp Infect. 2022 Apr;122:162-167. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2022.01.023. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
9
The Effect of Preoperative Oral Antibiotics in the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection after Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Propensity Score Matching Study.术前口服抗生素对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术后手术部位感染的预防作用:一项倾向评分匹配研究
J Anus Rectum Colon. 2021 Jul 29;5(3):319-326. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2021-005. eCollection 2021.
10
The Benefits of a Wound Protector in Preventing Incisional Surgical Site Infection in Elective Open Digestive Surgery: A Large-Scale Cohort Study.伤口保护器在择期开放性消化手术中预防手术切口部位感染的益处:一项大规模队列研究
World J Surg. 2017 Nov;41(11):2715-2722. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4082-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Modified Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Increases Seroma Evacuation: An Model.改良切口负压伤口疗法增加血清肿引流:模型研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Oct 21;2021:5846724. doi: 10.1155/2021/5846724. eCollection 2021.
2
Prophylactic subcutaneous drainage reduces post-operative incisional infections in colorectal surgeries: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.预防性皮下引流可降低结直肠手术后切口感染的风险:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Aug;36(8):1633-1642. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03908-8. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
3
Update on risk factors of surgical site infection in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
结直肠癌手术部位感染危险因素的研究进展:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Dec;35(12):2147-2156. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03706-8. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
4
Evaluation of negative-pressure wound therapy for surgical site infections after ileostomy closure in colorectal cancer patients: a prospective multicenter study.结直肠癌患者回肠造口术后切口感染应用负压伤口疗法的评价:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Surg Today. 2020 Dec;50(12):1687-1693. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02068-6. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
5
Preoperative oral antibiotics and surgical-site infections in colon surgery (ORALEV): a multicentre, single-blind, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial.术前口服抗生素与结肠手术部位感染(ORALEV):一项多中心、单盲、实用、随机对照试验。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Aug;5(8):729-738. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30075-3. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
6
Reduction of Postoperative Wound Infections by Antiseptica (RECIPE)?: A Randomized Controlled Trial.抗菌剂减少术后伤口感染(RECIPE)?一项随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2020 Jul;272(1):55-64. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003645.
7
Subcutaneous suction drains do not prevent surgical site infections in clean-contaminated abdominal surgery-results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.皮下引流管并不能预防清洁污染腹部手术的手术部位感染——系统评价和荟萃分析的结果。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019 Sep;404(6):663-668. doi: 10.1007/s00423-019-01813-x. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
8
Mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation versus no bowel preparation for elective colectomy (MOBILE): a multicentre, randomised, parallel, single-blinded trial.择期结肠切除术的机械性和口服抗生素肠道准备与无肠道准备(MOBILE):一项多中心、随机、平行、单盲试验。
Lancet. 2019 Sep 7;394(10201):840-848. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31269-3. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
9
Preoperative Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis Reduces Surgical Site Infections After Elective Colorectal Surgery: Results From a Before-After Study.择期结直肠手术后术前口服抗生素预防可降低手术部位感染:一项前后对照研究结果。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Jun 18;69(1):93-99. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy839.
10
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Closed Laparotomy Incisions in General and Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.负压伤口疗法在普通外科和结直肠外科闭合性剖腹切口的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Nov 1;153(11):e183467. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3467. Epub 2018 Nov 21.