Watson James, Green Mark A, Giebel Clarissa, Darlington-Pollock Frances, Akpan Asangaedem
School of Environmental Sciences, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Aging Ment Health. 2023 Jul-Aug;27(8):1476-1487. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2022.2107176. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
Healthcare services for people living with dementia (PLWD) are stretched, and government promises of increased funding remain undelivered. With the UK dementia population to surpass 1 million by 2024, and dementia care costs predicted to almost treble by 2040, it is essential we understand differences in healthcare use among PLWD. This study aimed to explore social and spatial variations in healthcare use among people diagnosed with dementia (2002-2016).
Data were derived from Electronic Health Records of Clinical Practice Research Datalink GP patients in England ( = 142,302). To standardise healthcare contacts, rates of healthcare contacts per year were calculated for three primary (GP observations and medications) and three secondary healthcare types [Accident & Emergency (A&E) attendances and, emergency and elective hospital admissions]. Fully-adjusted generalised linear regression models were used to identify healthcare use variation by social and spatial groups. Twelve models were generated, one for each healthcare type in early- and late-onset populations separately.
This study highlights numerous social and spatial variations in healthcare use among PLWD. Among PLWD, several groups tended to have healthcare service use more closely associated with negative outcomes, including a greater likelihood of A&E attendances and emergency and elective hospital admissions. These groups include: men, people from White ethnicity groups and people from more deprived and rural areas.
Systemic and social measures are needed to reduce variations in healthcare use inequalities in PWLD. These include greater healthcare continuity, health checks and medicines reviews, culturally appropriate services, better and more accessible treatment and improved infrastructure.
为痴呆症患者提供的医疗服务捉襟见肘,而政府增加资金投入的承诺仍未兑现。到2024年,英国痴呆症患者人数将超过100万,预计到2040年痴呆症护理成本将几乎增至三倍,因此我们必须了解痴呆症患者在医疗服务使用上的差异。本研究旨在探讨2002年至2016年期间被诊断患有痴呆症的人群在医疗服务使用方面的社会和空间差异。
数据来源于英国临床实践研究数据链全科医生患者的电子健康记录(n = 142,302)。为了使医疗接触标准化,计算了三种主要医疗类型(全科医生诊疗和用药)以及三种二级医疗类型[急诊就诊以及急诊和择期住院]的年医疗接触率。使用完全调整的广义线性回归模型来确定社会和空间群体在医疗服务使用上的差异。共生成了12个模型,分别针对早发性和晚发性人群中的每种医疗类型。
本研究突出了痴呆症患者在医疗服务使用方面存在的众多社会和空间差异。在痴呆症患者中,有几个群体的医疗服务使用往往与负面结果联系更紧密,包括急诊就诊以及急诊和择期住院的可能性更大。这些群体包括:男性、白人种族群体成员以及来自更贫困和农村地区的人。
需要采取系统性和社会性措施来减少痴呆症患者在医疗服务使用不平等方面的差异。这些措施包括增强医疗连续性、健康检查和药物审查、符合文化背景的服务、更好且更易获得的治疗以及改善基础设施。