Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Labor Berlin - Charité Vivantes GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Aug 12;22(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02374-0.
To investigate sonication as a new tool in microbiological probing of dental infections.
Comparison of a standard probing method: intraoperative swab, with sonication, and vortex of the removed tooth, was performed on 20 carious destructed teeth. Illumina high throughput sequencing of the 16S-rRNA-gene was used for assessing the microbial composition. Antibiotic susceptibility has been assigned based on known resistances of each detected species. Probing procedures were compared using Bland-Altmann-Test, and antibiotic susceptibility using the Friedmann-Test and alpha-adjusted post-hoc-analysis.
In total, 60 samples were analysed: 20 intraoperative swabs, 20 vortex fluids, and 20 sonication fluids. Sonication fluid yielded the highest number of bacterial sequencing reads in all three procedures. Comparing the operational taxonomic units (OTUs) of the identified bacteria, significantly more OTUs were found in sonication fluid samples. Phylum and order abundances varied between the three procedures. Significantly more Actinomycetales have been found in sonication fluid samples compared to swab samples. The assigned resistance rates for the identified bacteria (1.79-31.23%) showed no differences between the tested probing procedures. The lowest resistance rates were found for amoxicillin + clavulanate (3.95%) and levofloxacin (3.40%), with the highest in amoxicillin (30.21%) and clindamycin (21.88%).
By using sonication on extracted teeth, it is possible to get a more comprehensive image of the residing microbial flora compared to the standard procedure. If sonication is not available, vortexing is a potential alternative. In immunocompromised patients, especially when actinomycosis is suspected, sonication should be considered for a more detailed microbiological evaluation of the potential disease-causing microbiome. Due to the high rates of antibiotic resistance, a more targeted antibiotic therapy is favourable. Levofloxacin should be considered as a first-line alternative to amoxicillin + clavulanate in patients with an allergy to penicillin.
研究超声处理作为一种新的口腔感染微生物探测工具。
对 20 颗龋坏破坏的牙齿进行了标准探测方法(术中拭子)与超声处理、牙体移除后的涡旋比较。采用 Illumina 高通量测序 16S-rRNA 基因来评估微生物组成。根据每种检测到的物种的已知耐药性来分配抗生素敏感性。使用 Bland-Altman 检验比较探测程序,使用 Friedman 检验和 alpha 调整事后分析比较抗生素敏感性。
总共分析了 60 个样本:20 个术中拭子、20 个涡旋液和 20 个超声液。在所有三种程序中,超声液产生的细菌测序读数最多。比较鉴定细菌的分类单元(OTUs),在超声液样本中发现的 OTUs 明显更多。三种程序之间的门和目丰度不同。与拭子样本相比,超声液样本中发现的放线菌目明显更多。鉴定细菌的分配耐药率(1.79-31.23%)在测试探测程序之间没有差异。最低的耐药率为阿莫西林+克拉维酸(3.95%)和左氧氟沙星(3.40%),最高的为阿莫西林(30.21%)和克林霉素(21.88%)。
与标准程序相比,通过对提取的牙齿进行超声处理,可以更全面地了解居住微生物菌群。如果没有超声处理,可以使用涡旋作为潜在的替代方法。在免疫功能低下的患者中,特别是怀疑放线菌病时,应考虑超声处理以更详细地评估潜在疾病相关微生物组。由于抗生素耐药率较高,更具针对性的抗生素治疗更为有利。对青霉素过敏的患者,左氧氟沙星应被视为阿莫西林+克拉维酸的一线替代药物。