Circulating Tumor DNA as a Biomarker for Monitoring Patients with Solid Cancers: Comparison with Standard Protein Biomarkers.

BACKGROUND

Protein-based biomarkers are widely used in monitoring patients with diagnosed cancer. These biomarkers however, lack specificity for cancer and have poor sensitivity in detecting early recurrences and monitoring therapy effectiveness. Emerging data suggest that the use of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has several advantages over standard biomarkers.

CONTENT

Following curative-intent surgery for cancer, the presence of ctDNA is highly predictive of early disease recurrence, while in metastatic cancer an early decline in ctDNA following the initiation of treatment is predictive of good outcome. Compared with protein biomarkers, ctDNA provides greater cancer specificity and sensitivity for detecting early recurrent/metastatic disease. Thus, in patients with surgically resected colorectal cancer, multiple studies have shown that ctDNA is superior to carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in detecting residual disease and early recurrence. Similarly, in breast cancer, ctDNA was shown to be more accurate than carbohydrate antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3) in detecting early recurrences. Other advantages of ctDNA over protein biomarkers in monitoring cancer patients include a shorter half-life in plasma and an ability to predict likely response to specific therapies and identify mechanisms of therapy resistance. However, in contrast to proteins, ctDNA biomarkers are more expensive to measure, less widely available, and have longer turnaround times for reporting. Furthermore, ctDNA assays are less well standardized.

SUMMARY

Because of their advantages, it is likely that ctDNA measurements will enter clinical use in the future, where they will complement existing biomarkers and imaging in managing patients with cancer. Hopefully, these combined approaches will lead to a better outcome for patients.