Suppr超能文献

关于 COVID-19 后向接触者追踪效率的实证证据。

Empirical evidence on the efficiency of backward contact tracing in COVID-19.

机构信息

KU Leuven, Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology, Herestraat 49, box 6711, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.

Algemene Interne Geneeskunde, UZ Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2022 Aug 13;13(1):4750. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32531-6.

Abstract

Standard contact tracing practice for COVID-19 is to identify persons exposed to an infected person during the contagious period, assumed to start two days before symptom onset or diagnosis. In the first large cohort study on backward contact tracing for COVID-19, we extended the contact tracing window by 5 days, aiming to identify the source of the infection and persons infected by the same source. The risk of infection amongst these additional contacts was similar to contacts exposed during the standard tracing window and significantly higher than symptomatic individuals in a control group, leading to 42% more cases identified as direct contacts of an index case. Compared to standard practice, backward traced contacts required fewer tests and shorter quarantine. However, they were identified later in their infectious cycle if infected. Our results support implementing backward contact tracing when rigorous suppression of viral transmission is warranted.

摘要

COVID-19 的标准接触者追踪做法是确定在传染性期间接触到感染者的人,潜伏期被认为从症状出现或诊断前两天开始。在针对 COVID-19 的首次大型回溯性接触者追踪队列研究中,我们将接触者追踪窗口延长了 5 天,旨在确定感染源和被同一源感染的人。这些额外接触者的感染风险与标准追踪窗口期间接触者的感染风险相似,明显高于对照组中出现症状的个体,从而导致将 42%更多的病例确定为指数病例的直接接触者。与标准做法相比,回溯性接触者需要进行的检测更少,隔离时间更短。但是,如果被感染,他们在感染周期中的感染期会更晚被发现。我们的研究结果支持在需要严格抑制病毒传播的情况下实施回溯性接触者追踪。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b80f/9376071/fee4c95eac3a/41467_2022_32531_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验