Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2023 Jul;33(4):505-523. doi: 10.1038/s41370-022-00460-7. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
Dried blood spot (DBS) sampling is a simple, cost-effective, and minimally invasive alternative to venipuncture for measuring exposure biomarkers in public health and epidemiological research. DBS sampling provides advantages in field-based studies conducted in low-resource settings and in studies involving infants and children. In addition, DBS samples are routinely collected from newborns after birth (i.e., newborn dried blood spots, NDBS), with many states in the United States permitting access to archived NDBS samples for research purposes.
We review the state of the science for analyzing exposure biomarkers in DBS samples, both archived and newly collected, and provide guidance on sample collection, storage, and blood volume requirements associated with individual DBS assays. We discuss recent progress regarding analytical methods, analytical sensitivity, and specificity, sample volume requirements, contamination considerations, estimating extracted blood volumes, assessing stability and analyte recovery, and hematocrit effects.
A systematic search of PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase (Elsevier), and CINAHL (EBSCO) was conducted in March 2022. DBS method development and application studies were divided into three main chemical classes: environmental tobacco smoke, trace elements (including lead, mercury, cadmium, and arsenic), and industrial chemicals (including endocrine-disrupting chemicals and persistent organic pollutants). DBS method development and validation studies were scored on key quality-control and performance parameters by two members of the review team.
Our search identified 47 published reports related to measuring environmental exposure biomarkers in human DBS samples. A total of 28 reports (37 total studies) were on methods development and validation and 19 reports were primarily the application of previously developed DBS assays. High-performing DBS methods have been developed, validated, and applied for detecting environmental exposures to tobacco smoke, trace elements, and several important endocrine-disrupting chemicals and persistent organic pollutants. Additional work is needed for measuring cadmium, arsenic, inorganic mercury, and bisphenol A in DBS and NDBS samples.
We present an inventory and critical review of available assays for measuring environmental exposure biomarkers in DBS and NDBS samples to help facilitate this sampling medium as an emerging tool for public health (e.g., screening programs, temporal biomonitoring) and environmental epidemiology (e.g., field-based studies).
与静脉穿刺相比,干血斑(DBS)采样是一种简单、经济且微创的替代方法,可用于测量公共卫生和流行病学研究中的暴露生物标志物。DBS 采样在资源匮乏环境下进行的现场研究以及涉及婴儿和儿童的研究中具有优势。此外,通常会从新生儿出生后采集 DBS 样本(即新生儿干血斑,NDBS),美国许多州允许出于研究目的访问存档的 NDBS 样本。
我们回顾了分析 DBS 样本中暴露生物标志物的科学现状,包括存档样本和新采集样本,并提供了与个体 DBS 分析相关的样本采集、储存和血液量要求的指导。我们讨论了最近在分析方法、分析灵敏度和特异性、样本量要求、污染考虑因素、提取血液量估计、评估稳定性和分析物回收率以及血细胞比容效应方面的进展。
我们于 2022 年 3 月在 PubMed(MEDLINE)、Embase(Elsevier)和 CINAHL(EBSCO)中进行了系统检索。DBS 方法的开发和应用研究分为三大化学类别:环境烟草烟雾、微量元素(包括铅、汞、镉和砷)和工业化学品(包括内分泌干扰化学品和持久性有机污染物)。两位评审小组成员根据关键质量控制和性能参数对 DBS 方法的开发和验证研究进行了评分。
我们的检索共确定了 47 篇与测量人类 DBS 样本中环境暴露生物标志物相关的已发表报告。其中,28 篇报告(37 项研究)涉及方法的开发和验证,19 篇报告主要是先前开发的 DBS 分析的应用。已经开发、验证和应用了高性能的 DBS 方法来检测环境中烟草烟雾、微量元素以及几种重要的内分泌干扰化学品和持久性有机污染物的暴露。还需要进一步研究测量 DBS 和 NDBS 样本中镉、砷、无机汞和双酚 A 的方法。
我们提供了一份关于测量 DBS 和 NDBS 样本中环境暴露生物标志物的现有分析方法的清单和关键评价,以帮助促进这种采样方法作为公共卫生(例如,筛查计划、时间生物监测)和环境流行病学(例如,现场研究)的新兴工具。