Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust (TSDFT), Torbay, UK.
Community and Primary Care Research Group, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 15;22(1):1038. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08415-2.
This study evaluates the effectiveness of a targeted telephone-based case management service that aimed to reduce ED attendance amongst frequent attenders, known to disproportionately contribute to demand. Evidence on the effectiveness of these services varies.
A 24-month controlled before-and-after study, following 808 patients (128 cases and 680 controls (41 were non-compliant)) who were offered the service in the first four months of operation within a UK ED department. Patients stratified as high-risk of reattending ED within 6 months by a predictive model were manually screened. Those positively reviewed were offered a non-clinical, nurse-led, telephone-based health coaching, consisting of care planning, coordination and goal setting for up to 9 months. Service effectiveness was estimated using a difference-in-differences (DiD) analysis. Incident rate of ED and Minor Injury Unit (MIU) attendances and average length of stay in intervention recipients and controls over 12 months after receiving their service offer following ED attendance were compared, adjusting for the prior 12-month period, sex and age, to give an incidence rate ratio (IRR).
Intervention recipients were more likely to be female (63.3% versus 55.4%), younger (mean of 69 years versus 76 years), and have higher levels of ED activity (except for MIU) than controls. Mean rates fell between periods for all outcomes (except for MIU attendance). The Intention-to-Treat analysis indicated non-statistically significant effect of the intervention in reducing all outcomes, except for MIU attendances, with IRRs: ED attendances, 0.856 (95% CI: 0.631, 1.160); ED admissions, 0.871 (95% CI: 0.628, 1.208); length of stay for emergency and elective admissions: 0.844 (95% CI: 0.619, 1.151) and 0.781 (95% CI: 0.420, 1.454). MIU attendance increased with an IRR: 2.638 (95% CI: 1.041, 6.680).
Telephone-based health coaching appears to be effective in reducing ED attendances and admissions, with shorter lengths of stay, in intervention recipients over controls. Future studies need to capture outcomes beyond acute activity, and better understand how services like this provide added value.
本研究评估了一项针对频繁就诊者的目标明确的电话病例管理服务的有效性,这些就诊者过度占用了需求,众所周知,他们对需求的贡献不成比例。关于这些服务的有效性的证据各不相同。
这是一项为期 24 个月的对照前后研究,对英国 ED 部门运营的前四个月内接受该服务的 808 名患者(128 例病例和 680 例对照(41 例不遵守规定))进行了随访。通过预测模型对在 6 个月内有再次就诊 ED 高风险的患者进行了手动筛查。对经审查阳性的患者提供了非临床、护士主导的电话健康指导,包括护理计划、协调和目标设定,最长可达 9 个月。使用差异分析(DiD)分析估计服务效果。比较了接受干预的患者和对照组在接受 ED 就诊后 12 个月内的 ED 和轻伤单位(MIU)就诊次数和平均住院时间,调整了前 12 个月、性别和年龄,以给出发病率比(IRR)。
与对照组相比,干预组更有可能为女性(63.3%比 55.4%)、年轻(平均 69 岁比 76 岁)、ED 活动水平更高(除了 MIU)。所有结果在两个时期之间的平均值都有所下降(除了 MIU 就诊次数)。意向治疗分析表明,干预对减少所有结果(除了 MIU 就诊次数)没有统计学意义,除了 MIU 就诊次数,发病率比(IRR)分别为:ED 就诊次数,0.856(95%CI:0.631,1.160);ED 入院,0.871(95%CI:0.628,1.208);急诊和择期入院的住院时间分别为 0.844(95%CI:0.619,1.151)和 0.781(95%CI:0.420,1.454)。MIU 就诊次数增加,IRR 为 2.638(95%CI:1.041,6.680)。
电话健康指导似乎可以有效减少干预组与对照组相比的 ED 就诊次数和入院次数,住院时间更短。未来的研究需要捕捉急性活动以外的结果,并更好地了解此类服务如何提供附加值。