Sethi Vidhu, Van der Laan Luke, Gupta Sanjeev, Piros K Cornelius
GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare, Singapore.
Faculty of Business, Education, Law & Arts, University of Southern Queensland, Queensland, Australia.
J Pain Res. 2022 Aug 6;15:2263-2272. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S373382. eCollection 2022.
To seek indicative evidence on clinical prescription practice and perspectives regarding combined oral paracetamol (APAP) and/or topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) therapy for managing mild-to-moderate osteoarthritis (OA) pain.
An exploratory qualitative study to investigate the perspectives towards using APAP and/or topical NSAIDs for OA pain management and whether current clinical practices are aligned with OA guidelines was conducted using a two-round modified Delphi methodology among three general practitioners, three orthopedists, and two pharmacists from Australia, Malaysia, and Sweden during January-June 2021. In the first round, 60-minute virtual in-depth interviews were conducted individually; in the second round, summary of the key findings was shared with the panel to seek clarity on the level of consensus (≥70% unanimity) and disagreement.
The healthcare professionals (HCPs) agreed that APAP was considered as a universally accepted pharmacologic for most OA patients except those with contraindications or allergies. Consensus was achieved towards APAP combination with topical NSAIDs being a safer alternative than with oral NSAIDs. However, prescription uptake of combined therapy APAP with topical NSAIDs was low among the panel due to lack of strong scientific evidence on efficacy and awareness. Differences in clinical practice across and within countries could be due to different reference sources for OA pain - clinical practice experience or local/international guidelines/medical products handbooks.
The study suggests an opportunity to raise awareness of the suitability and potential benefits for adjuvant topical NSAIDs to APAP for effective OA pain management as well as a need for universal OA guidelines.
寻找关于联合使用口服对乙酰氨基酚(APAP)和/或外用非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)治疗轻至中度骨关节炎(OA)疼痛的临床处方实践及观点的指示性证据。
2021年1月至6月期间,采用两轮改良德尔菲法,对来自澳大利亚、马来西亚和瑞典的三名全科医生、三名骨科医生和两名药剂师进行了一项探索性定性研究,以调查使用APAP和/或外用NSAIDs治疗OA疼痛的观点,以及当前临床实践是否符合OA指南。第一轮,分别进行60分钟的虚拟深度访谈;第二轮,将关键发现的总结与小组分享,以寻求在共识水平(≥70%一致意见)和分歧方面的明确意见。
医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)一致认为,除有禁忌证或过敏的患者外,APAP被认为是大多数OA患者普遍接受的药物。对于APAP与外用NSAIDs联合使用比与口服NSAIDs联合使用更安全这一点达成了共识。然而,由于缺乏关于疗效和认知度的有力科学证据,小组中APAP与外用NSAIDs联合治疗的处方使用率较低。不同国家之间和国家内部临床实践的差异可能是由于OA疼痛的参考来源不同——临床实践经验或当地/国际指南/医疗产品手册。
该研究表明,有机会提高人们对辅助外用NSAIDs与APAP联合用于有效管理OA疼痛的适用性和潜在益处的认识,以及对通用OA指南的需求。