Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Nutr Clin Pract. 2023 Apr;38(2):329-339. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10900. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
Patients receiving home enteral tube feeding (HETF) have a high risk of complications and readmission to hospital. This study aims to evaluate effectiveness of staff- and/or patient-focused service-improvement strategies on clinical, patient-reported, and economic outcomes for patients receiving HETF across adult settings.
The search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases. Quality of studies were appraised using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment.
Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. Pooled data found targeted HETF education with patients, carers, and staff significantly improved knowledge immediately after education and was sustained at 3-6 months. Multimodal interventions, including the formation of specialist HETF teams, significantly reduced complications such as infection, gastrostomy blockage, tube displacement, and feed intolerance but do not significantly reduce unplanned hospital encounters (outpatient clinic visits, hospitalizations, and emergency presentations). Owing to the high risk of bias in the included studies, there is low-quality evidence to support staff training, patient education, and dedicated HETF teams.
This review highlights the need for further quality research to allow higher-level evidence for determining the usefulness of interventions aimed at improving outcomes for patients receiving HETF. Future research needs to include greater assessment of quality of life, quantification of the value of interventions in economic terms, and use of translational research frameworks. However, effective staff and patient education programs, along with comprehensive multidisciplinary care, should be considered standard care until a larger research base is developed.
接受家庭肠内管饲(HETF)的患者有发生并发症和再次住院的高风险。本研究旨在评估以员工和/或患者为重点的服务改进策略对成人接受 HETF 的患者的临床、患者报告和经济结果的有效性。
使用 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 CINAHL 数据库进行检索。使用 Cochrane 协作风险偏倚工具和推荐评估、制定和评估(GRADE)评估对研究质量进行评估。
符合纳入标准的研究有 11 项。汇总数据发现,针对患者、照顾者和员工的靶向 HETF 教育显著提高了教育后即刻的知识水平,并在 3-6 个月时保持不变。包括建立专门的 HETF 团队在内的多种模式干预措施显著减少了感染、胃造口堵塞、管移位和不耐受等并发症,但并未显著减少非计划性医院就诊(门诊就诊、住院和急诊就诊)。由于纳入研究的偏倚风险较高,因此有低质量证据支持员工培训、患者教育和专门的 HETF 团队。
本综述强调需要进一步进行高质量研究,以提供更高水平的证据来确定旨在改善接受 HETF 的患者结局的干预措施的有效性。未来的研究需要更全面地评估生活质量,用经济术语量化干预措施的价值,并使用转化研究框架。然而,在更大的研究基础建立之前,有效的员工和患者教育计划以及全面的多学科护理应被视为标准护理。