Suppr超能文献

旨在减少胃肠内镜检查中废物产生的针对性干预措施。

Targeted intervention to achieve waste reduction in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

作者信息

Cunha Neves João A, Roseira Joana, Queirós Patrícia, Sousa Helena Tavares, Pellino Gianluca, Cunha Miguel F

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Algarve University Hospital Centre, Portimão, Portugal

ABC-Algarve Biomedical Centre, University of Algarve, Faro, Portugal.

出版信息

Gut. 2023 Feb;72(2):306-313. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327005. Epub 2022 Aug 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopy is healthcare's third largest generator of medical waste in hospitals. This prospective study aimed to measure a single unit's waste carbon footprint and perform a pioneer intervention towards a more sustainable endoscopy practice. The relation of regulated medical waste (RMW; material fully contaminated with blood or body fluids or containing infectious agents) versus landfill waste (non-recyclable material not fully contaminated) may play a critical role.

DESIGN

In a four-stage prospective study, following a 4-week observational audit with daily weighing of both waste types (stage 1), stage 2 consisted of a 1-week intervention with team education of waste handling. Recycling bins were placed in endoscopy rooms, landfill and RMW bins were relocated. During stages 3 (1 month after intervention) and 4 (4 months after intervention), daily endoscopic waste was weighed. Equivalence of 1 kg of landfill waste to 1 kg carbon dioxide equivalent (CO) and 1 kg of RMW to 3kgCO was assumed. Paired samples t-tests for comparisons.

RESULTS

From stage 1 to stage 3, mean total waste and RMW were reduced by 12.9% (p=0.155) and 41.4% (p=0.010), respectively, whereas landfill (p=0.059) and recycling waste increased (paper: p=0.001; plastic: p=0.007). While mean endoscopy load was similar (46.2 vs 44.5, p=0.275), a total decrease of CO by 31.6% (138.8kgCO) was found (mean kgCO109.7 vs 74.9, p=0.018). The annual reduction was calculated at 1665.6kgCO. All these effects were sustained 4 months after the intervention (stage 4) without objections by responsible endoscopy personnel.

CONCLUSION

In this interventional study, applying sustainability measures to a real-world scenario, RMW reduction and daily recycling were achieved and sustained over time, without compromising endoscopy productivity.

摘要

目的

在内镜检查是医院医疗废物的第三大来源。这项前瞻性研究旨在衡量单个单位的废物碳足迹,并对更可持续的内镜检查实践进行开创性干预。受控医疗废物(RMW;完全被血液或体液污染或含有传染源的物质)与填埋废物(未完全污染的不可回收材料)之间的关系可能起着关键作用。

设计

在一项四阶段前瞻性研究中,在对两种废物类型进行每日称重的为期4周的观察性审计(第1阶段)之后,第2阶段包括为期1周的干预,对团队进行废物处理教育。在内镜检查室放置回收箱,重新安置填埋和RMW箱。在第3阶段(干预后1个月)和第4阶段(干预后4个月),对每日内镜检查废物进行称重。假设1千克填埋废物相当于1千克二氧化碳当量(CO),1千克RMW相当于3千克CO。采用配对样本t检验进行比较。

结果

从第1阶段到第3阶段,平均总废物和RMW分别减少了12.9%(p = 0.155)和41.4%(p = 0.010),而填埋废物(p = 0.059)和回收废物增加(纸张:p = 0.001;塑料:p = 0.007)。虽然平均内镜检查量相似(46.2对44.5,p = 0.275),但发现CO总量减少了31.6%(138.8千克CO)(平均千克CO109.7对74.9,p = 0.018)。计算出的年度减少量为1665.6千克CO。所有这些效果在干预后4个月(第4阶段)得以持续,内镜检查相关人员没有提出异议。

结论

在这项干预性研究中,将可持续性措施应用于实际场景,实现了RMW的减少和每日回收利用,并随着时间的推移得以持续,且未影响内镜检查的效率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验